Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
A Comparative Performance Assessment of Optimized Multilevel Ensemble Learning Model with Existing Classifier Models
Mukesh Kumar1, Karan Bajaj1, Bhisham Sharma1
1Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Abstract:
To predict the class level of any classification problem, predictive models are used and mostly a single predictive model is built to predict the class level of any classification problem; current research considers multiple predictive models to predict the class level. Ensemble modeling means instead of building a single predictive model, it is proposed to build a multilevel predictive model, which generalizes to predict all the class levels with an adequate percent of accuracy, that is, from 70% to 90% by applying and using a different combination of classification algorithms. In this article, a multilevel approach for selecting base classifiers for building an ensemble classification model is proposed. The rudimentary concept behind this approach is to drop lousy performing features and collinearity from the selected data set for ensemble modeling. For the evaluation of the proposed multilevel predictive model, different data sets from the University of California, Irvine, repository have been used and comparisons with the modern classifier's models have been conducted. The implementation analyses demonstrate the potency and excellence of the novel approach when compared with other modern classification models (three-layered artificial neural network, Radial Variant Function Neural Network/Fish Swarm Algorithm). The classification accuracy achieved with selected algorithms lies in the range of 70%-88.3%. Among all the selected classification algorithms, the lowest accuracy is achieved by the naive Bayes algorithm, which is close to 71.9%. However, the proposed algorithm (NB-RF-LR-SEMod), which is a combination of different classifiers, achieved a maximum accuracy of 88.3% on the Photographic and Imaging Manufacturers Association Diabetes data set, which is, by far, the best to any single classifier. Hence, this proposed work is helpful for any health care official to detect the diabetes problem at an early stage and prevent the affected person from future complications of it.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Classification of Systems-II
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...

