Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Simulating Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Using a Neonatal Piglet Model
Published on: May 26, 2023
Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support Transport in Western Canada: Experience over 14 years
Karen Ka Yan Leung1, Gonzalo Garcia Guerra2,3, Allan Decaen2,3
1From the Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong.
Insights
Critically ill children on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can be safely transported by specialized teams. Transporting patients from centers with ECLS cannulation programs is as safe as primary transports, with similar survival rates.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Cardiopulmonary support technologies
Background:
- Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a vital intervention for critically ill children with organ failure.
- Pediatric ECLS transport requires specialized teams and protocols to manage complex cases during transit.
- Outcomes and safety of interfacility ECLS transports, particularly concerning cannulation strategies, require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and outcomes of pediatric ECLS transports conducted by a specialized transport team.
- To compare outcomes between primary transports (cannulation by the transport team) and secondary transports (cannulation by the referring facility).
- To assess the impact of referring centers having an established ECLS cannulation program on transport outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients transported on ECLS between 2004 and 2018.
- Comparison of outcomes and complications between primary and secondary ECLS transports.
- Analysis of secondary transports based on whether the referring facility had an ECLS cannulation program.
- Data collection included transport characteristics, cannulation strategy, complications, and survival to ECLS decannulation.
Main Results:
- A total of 68 ECLS transports were analyzed, with a median transport distance of 298 km.
- Mean time from referral call to ECLS initiation was significantly shorter for secondary transports (2.5 hours) compared to primary transports (7.8 hours).
- Complications were frequent (95%) but rarely led to adverse outcomes, with no significant difference between primary and secondary transports.
- Survival to ECLS decannulation showed no significant difference between primary (90%) and secondary (74%) transports.
- Survival was higher for children cannulated by the specialized team or at a center with an ECLS program (82%) versus those cannulated at centers without such a program (59%).
Conclusions:
- Specialized pediatric ECLS transport teams can safely manage critically ill children requiring extracorporeal support during interfacility transfers.
- Secondary transports from referring centers with established ECLS cannulation programs are safe and yield comparable outcomes to primary transports.
- The cannulation strategy at the referring facility significantly impacts ECLS survival, highlighting the importance of experienced ECLS programs at referring institutions.
Abstract:
This retrospective cohort study describes all children transported on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) by the Stollery Children's Hospital Pediatric Transport team (SCH-PTT) between 2004 and 2018. We compared outcomes and complications between primary (SCH-PTT performed ECLS cannulation) vs. secondary (cannulation performed by referring facility) transports, as well as secondary transports from referring centers with and without an established ECLS cannulation program. SCH-PTT performed 68 ECLS transports during the study period. Median (IQR) transport distance was 298 (298-1,068) kilometers. Mean (SD) times from referral call to ECLS-initiation were: primary transports 7.8 (2.9) vs. 2.5(3.5) hours for secondary transports, p value < 0.001. Complications were common (n = 65, 95%) but solved without leading to adverse outcomes. There were no significant differences in the number of complications between primary and secondary transports. There was no significant difference in survival to ECLS decannulation between primary 9 (90%) and secondary transports 43 (74%), p value = 0.275. ECLS survival was higher for children cannulated by the SCH-PTT or a center with an ECLS cannulation program: 42 (82%) vs. 10 (59%), p value = 0.048. Critically ill children on ECLS can be safely transported by a specialized pediatric ECLS transport team. Secondary transports from a center with an ECLS cannulation program are also safe and have similar results as primary transports.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

