Deep Venous Arterialization for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia in Atherosclerosis Patients - A Meta-Analysis
Qi Yan1, Sanaa Prasla2, Daniel C Carlisle2
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; South Texas Center for Vascular Care, South Texas Medical Center, San Antonio, TX.
Insights
Venous arterialization offers a viable option for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients, achieving a 79% limb salvage rate. However, further high-quality studies are necessary to confirm its long-term effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) presents a significant challenge, especially when standard revascularization is not feasible.
- Venous arterialization is emerging as a novel alternative treatment for CLTI.
- This study systematically reviews the outcomes of venous arterialization in CLTI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and analyze the outcomes of venous arterialization in patients with CLTI.
- To assess the effectiveness of venous arterialization as an alternative revascularization strategy.
- To identify the limb salvage and survival rates associated with venous arterialization.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across five databases following PRISMA methodology.
- Inclusion criteria focused on English original research papers concerning CLTI patients treated with venous arterialization.
- Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model for studies with a sample size of 10 or more.
Main Results:
- Twelve studies encompassing 442 patients were analyzed, with 374 undergoing venous arterialization.
- The pooled 1-year limb salvage rate was 79.0% and the 1-year survival rate was 85.7%.
- Pooled 30-day mortality was 3.7%, morbidity was 15.5%, and major adverse limb events were 16.7%.
Conclusions:
- Venous arterialization demonstrates an acceptable 1-year limb salvage rate of 79% for CLTI patients.
- The current evidence is based on a low level of evidence, necessitating further investigation.
- High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to definitively establish the effectiveness of venous arterialization for CLTI.
Background:
Venous arterialization is an upcoming and novel alternative in chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients in the absence of standard revascularization options. The aim of this study is to systematically review and analyze outcomes of venous arterialization.
Methods:
A systematic literature search was performed in 5 databases using the PRISMA methodology. Inclusion criteria were English language original research papers on CLTI patients treated with venous arterialization.
Exclusion Criteria:
absence of CLTI due to atherosclerosis, duplicate study or reporting of patients, meeting abstract only. Quality and risk of bias were evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model on articles that have a sample size of equal or greater than 10.
Results:
Twelve studies included 442 patients that underwent treatment for 445 limbs (374 patients and 377 limbs underwent venous arterialization while remainder underwent traditional bypass and served as control subjects). Average age was 66 [18 studies, range 37 -91 years], 68% were male [271/366, 15 studies] and 67% diabetic [271/406, 16 studies]). Most limbs (88%, 352/398, 16 studies) had tissue loss. Pooled 30-day mortality was 3.7% (95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.8 -6.6%), 30-day morbidity was 15.5% (95%-CI 3.2 -27.8%), 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event was 5.2% (95%-CI 1.7 -8.6%) and 30-day major adverse limb event was 16.7% (95%-CI 1.5 -31.9%). Pooled 1-year limb-salvage rate was 79.0% (95%-CI 68.7 -90.7) and 1-year survival rate was 85.7% (95%-CI 76.2 -96.4). Studies quality varied significantly across studies.
Conclusion:
Venous arterialization has an acceptable a 1-year limb salvage rate of 79%, however, this is based on low levels of evidence. More randomized controlled trials or high-quality cohort studies are needed to further define the effectiveness of this procedure for CLTI.
More Related Videos
08:16High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Footpad Vasculature in a Murine Hindlimb Gangrene Model
Published on: March 16, 2022
08:05Occlusion of the Great and Small Saphenous Vein Using Copolymeric Glue Based on N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Methacryloxy Sulfolane
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
