Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025
Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Use of the intra-aortic balloon pump after valve replacement. Predictive indices, correlative parameters, and patient
Abstract:
Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation required as an adjunct during weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass or for circulatory support in the immediate postoperative period was analyzed in 2,498 patients undergoing valve replacement between December, 1972, and September, 1981. A total of 140 successful insertions were performed in 155 attempts. Ninety-five of these patients were from a homogeneous cohort of 1,908 patients undergoing valve replacement with porcine xenografts and were analyzed for factors that might be useful predictors of the need for balloon pump support. Univariate analysis of individual factors delineated preoperative characteristics in patients having mitral valve replacement and intraoperative factors in all patients that correlated with use of the balloon pump. Multivariate analysis revealed a subset of male patients with mitral valve and coronary disease most likely to require counterpulsation. Overall survival rate was markedly reduced at 30 days (balloon counterpulsation plus valve replacement, 50% +/- 5%; valve replacement only, 96% +/- 5%; p less than 0.001) and at 1 year (balloon counterpulsation plus valve replacement, 38% +/- 5%; valve replacement only, 89% +/- 1%, p less than 0.001) if balloon pumping was required. The entire group of 140 patients were retrospectively analyzed for factors predictive of survival. Patients requiring balloon pumping who had a preoperative diagnosis of aortic regurgitation had a lower 1 year survival rate (13% +/- 9%) than the total subgroup undergoing balloon counterpulsation (36% +/- 4.0%) (p = 0.002). Similarly patients treated by balloon counterpulsation who had postoperative renal failure had a significantly lower 1 year survival rate (17% +/- 5%) than those without renal failure (66% +/- 6%) (p = 0.003). The survival rate of patients who required this therapeutic modality after valve replacement is poor. Other methods of hemodynamic support are necessary.
