Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Timely community palliative and end-of-life care: a realist synthesis
Mila Petrova1, Geoff Wong2, Isla Kuhn3
1Palliative & End of Life Care in Cambridge (PELiCAM) Research Group, Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK mp686@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Background:
Community-based and home-based palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) services, often underpinned by primary care provision, are becoming increasingly popular. One of the key challenges associated with them is their timely initiation. The latter requires an accurate enough prediction of how close to death a patient is.
Methods:
Using 'realist synthesis' tools, this review sought to develop explanations of how primary care and community PEoLC programmes generate their outcomes, with the explanations presented as context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ASSIA, Sociological Abstracts and SCIE Social Care Online were originally searched. A multistage process of focusing the review was employed, with timely identification of the EoL stage and timely initiation of associated services representing the final review focus. Synthesised sources included 21 full-text documents and 324 coded abstracts, with 253 'core contents' abstracts generating >800 codes.
Results:
Numerous PEoLC policies and programmes are embedded in a framework of Preparation and Planning for Death and Dying, with identification of the dying stage setting in motion key systems and services. This is challenged by: (1) accumulated evidence demonstrating low accuracy of prognostic judgements; (2) many individuals' orientation towards Living and Hope; (3) expanding grey zones between palliative and curative care; (4) the complexity of referral decisions; (5) the loss of pertinent information in hierarchical relationships and (6) the ambiguous value of having 'more time'.
Conclusion:
Prioritising temporal criteria in initiating PEoLC services is not sufficiently supported by current evidence and can have significant unintended consequences.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42018097218.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Continuing Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Restorative Care
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...

