Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection
Makoto Takano1, Yui Nakayama1, Hisao Matsuda1
1Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Yokohama City Seibu Hospital St. Marianna University School of Medicine Yokohama Yokohama City Japan.
Insights
Eligible heart failure patients not receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) experienced significantly more hospitalizations and deaths. This highlights the underutilization of CRT in heart failure management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Increasing prevalence of chronic heart failure in Japan.
- Stagnant rates of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) despite growing heart failure cases.
- Need to evaluate outcomes for eligible CRT patients not receiving the therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical impact of underutilized cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in eligible heart failure patients.
- To compare outcomes between heart failure patients eligible for CRT and those ineligible, all receiving only pharmacological therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 214 heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% who did not receive CRT.
- Stratification into Group A (26 eligible for CRT) and Group B (188 ineligible for CRT).
- Comparison of cumulative hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiogenic deaths over a 675-day follow-up.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, sex, heart disease) between groups.
- Group A (eligible for CRT) had significantly higher rates of heart failure hospitalizations and cardiogenic deaths compared to Group B (log-rank test, P < .01).
- Hazard ratio for adverse events in Group A was 3.05 (95% CI, 1.31-7.09).
Conclusions:
- Only 12% of evaluated heart failure patients were eligible for CRT, indicating significant underutilization.
- Despite eligibility, no patients in the study received CRT, leading to worse clinical outcomes.
- Strong recommendation for increased CRT utilization in indicated heart failure patients.
Background:
The number of patients with chronic heart failure is increasing in Japan. However, the annual number of patients with heart failure who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been constant in the last few years. In this study, we evaluated patients who did not receive CRT despite being eligible for this treatment to elucidate the clinical impact of CRT administration.
Methods:
We assessed 214 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% (excluding patients treated with CRT) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography between January and May 2020 at our institution. The patients were stratified into two groups: Group A (n = 26; patients eligible for CRT) and Group B (n = 188; patients ineligible for CRT); however, all patients only received pharmacological therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of these patients with respect to the cumulative number of hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiogenic deaths.
Results:
We observed no significant between-group differences in age, sex, and severity/diagnosis of organic heart disease. Group A had a significantly higher number of hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiogenic deaths than Group B (log-rank test, P < .01; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-7.09; average follow-up period, 675 days).
Conclusions:
This study shows that 12% of patients were eligible for CRT. However, the implantation rate was low and no one was implanted. CRT is underutilized in patients who have heart failure with reduced LVEF. Therefore, we strongly recommend CRT for patients with indications for CRT.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation


