Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating primary prevention programmes against cancer.

J A Hanley

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Time-dependent prognostic accuracy measures for recurrent event data.

    Biometrics·2024
    Same author

    Inference for covariate-adjusted time-dependent prognostic accuracy measures.

    Statistics in medicine·2023
    Same author

    Screening histories and contact with physicians as determinants of cervical cancer risk in Montreal, Quebec.

    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2014
    Same author

    Impact of HLA mismatch at first kidney transplant on lifetime with graft function in young recipients.

    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2014
    Same author

    Risk of prostate cancer death in long-term users of warfarin: a population-based case-control study.

    Cancer causes & control : CCC·2013
    Same author

    Change in mortality risk over time in young kidney transplant recipients.

    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2011
    Same journal

    Diplomatic roles of regional coordinators for WHO Member States.

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluation of an application for investments in cataract surgery, Ethiopia.

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2026
    Same journal

    An umbrella protocol for the clinical evaluation of diagnostics in infectious disease.

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2026
    Same journal

    Fundamental changes in regulation to improve access to biosimilars.

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2026
    Same journal

    A public-private partnership for facility-based tuberculosis screening using chest radiographs, Viet Nam.

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2026
    Same journal

    Ebola at a critical juncture: preparedness must outpace transmission.

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2026
    See all related articles

    Primary cancer prevention strategies, including lifestyle changes and medical interventions, are crucial for reducing global cancer rates. Rigorous scientific evaluation is essential before implementing these potentially costly public health initiatives.

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Public Health
    • Preventive Medicine

    Background:

    • Approximately one-third of all global cancers are preventable, highlighting the significance of primary prevention.
    • Primary prevention strategies aim to reduce exposure to known carcinogens through legislation, education, vaccination, or chemoprevention.
    • Implementing prevention programs requires careful scientific evaluation due to costs, resource competition, and uncertain outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline the core principles for designing scientific evaluations of cancer prevention interventions.
    • To address the scientific and logistical challenges inherent in cancer prevention research.
    • To guide the evidence-based implementation of primary cancer prevention strategies.

    Main Methods:

    • Discusses principles for designing intervention evaluations, drawing examples from cardiovascular disease research.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Highlights the need for controlled intervention studies, including traditional clinical trials for vaccination and chemoprevention.
  • Emphasizes the necessity of health service research for evaluating population-level interventions like legislation and education.

    • Main Results:

    • Cancer prevention interventions, particularly those involving lifestyle changes, present significant scientific and logistical hurdles.
    • Vaccination and chemoprevention can be assessed using clinical trial methodologies with intermediate or final endpoints.
    • Community-based interventions require robust, controlled health service research for effective evaluation.

    Conclusions:

    • Scientific evaluation is paramount for the judicious implementation of cancer prevention strategies.
    • A combination of clinical trials and health service research is needed to assess diverse prevention approaches.
    • Evidence-based primary cancer prevention is a vital component of comprehensive cancer control efforts.