Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

500
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
500
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

196
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
196
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

286
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
286
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

336
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
336
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

362
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
362
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.5K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms treated with hypomethylating agents + venetoclax-an analysis from the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) VALIDATE database.

Blood cancer journal·2026
Same author

Real-world, multi-omics validation of the clinical relevance of molecular taxonomy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

HemaSphere·2026
Same author

Evolution to complex karyotype disease in mono-allelic <i>TP53</i>-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia: a cohort study.

Haematologica·2026
Same author

PT/Cy-based alloBMT platform as a curative, accessible alternative for pediatric and young adult severe aplastic anemia.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

A PBD-dimer containing antibody drug conjugate targeting CCRL2 for high-risk MDS/AML including TP53-mutated disease.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

American Society of Hematology 2026 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Severe Acquired Aplastic Anemia.

Blood advances·2026
Same journal

Nze C, Flowers CR. Barriers to accessing cellular therapy for patients receiving care in community practices. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023;2023(1):382-385.

Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program·2025
Same journal

CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies in the management of multiple myeloma.

Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program·2025
Same journal

Emerging immunotherapy advances for non-Hodgkin lymphomas: engaging T cells in the fight.

Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program·2025
Same journal

Anticoagulants in hematologic malignancies: what is the data?

Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program·2025
Same journal

Diagnosis and management of cold agglutinin disease.

Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program·2025
Same journal

What to know about rare B-cell malignancies in 2025.

Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Lower risk but high risk.

Amy E DeZern1

  • 1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD.

Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program
|December 10, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate risk stratification is vital for managing myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Some lower-risk MDS patients may have a worse prognosis than predicted by current scoring systems.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.4K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

418

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.4K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

418

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Genomics

Background:

  • Accurate prognostication is critical for managing myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), where survival varies widely.
  • Current risk stratification systems, like the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R), have limitations in predicting outcomes for all patients.

Observation:

  • Molecular genetic information and uncaptured disease characteristics can significantly impact MDS risk stratification.
  • A subset of patients classified as lower-risk (LR) MDS may exhibit behavior more characteristic of higher-risk (HR) disease.

Findings:

  • The International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) may underestimate the risk for certain lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients.
  • Molecular and clinical factors beyond the IPSS-R are crucial for refining risk assessment in MDS.

Implications:

  • Improved identification of lower-risk MDS patients with unfavorable prognoses is needed.
  • Tailoring treatment strategies based on more comprehensive risk assessments can optimize patient management and outcomes in MDS.