Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

03:37
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
Published on: March 1, 2024
953
Evaluation of Sex-Aware PrediXcan Models for Predicting Gene Expression
Emily Mahoney1, Vaibhav Janve, Timothy J Hohman
1Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
|December 10, 2021
Summary
We developed sex-aware PrediXcan models to predict gene expression, finding minimal but significant improvements for some sex-specific genes, particularly those involved in mitochondrial metabolism.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Systems Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Gene-based methods like PrediXcan predict gene expression using genetic data.
- Sex differences in gene expression and genetic architecture are known but not incorporated into current models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate sex-aware PrediXcan models for improved gene expression prediction.
- To investigate the impact of sex-specific genetic architecture on gene expression.
Main Methods:
- Built sex-aware PrediXcan models using whole blood transcriptomic data from GTEx.
- Validated models using lymphoblast RNA sequencing data from the 1000 Genomes Project.
- Evaluated prediction performance (R2) for autosomal genes in males and females.
Main Results:
- Successfully predicted 1,149 genes in males and 623 in females; 3,511 genes were not sex-specific.
- Sex-specific models showed improved prediction for 15% of sex-specific genes.
- Several sex-specific genes, including those in mitochondrial metabolism, had significantly better prediction with sex-specific weights.
Conclusions:
- Sex-aware PrediXcan models provide robust sex-specific prediction signals.
- Genetic architecture contributes minimally to sex-specific expression, but sex-specific models offer utility.
- Future research should explore X chromosome and tissue specificity for genetically regulated expression.
Related Concept Videos
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes
8.9K
In most organisms, sex is determined by the ratio of X and Y chromosomes. However, in some organisms, such as Drosophila and C.elegans, sex is determined by the ratio of the number of X chromosomes to the number of sets of autosomes. The Y chromosome in Drosophila is active but does not determine sex. It contains genes responsible for the production of sperms in adult flies.
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female...
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female...
8.9K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
778
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Sensitivity is the...
778
Genetic Screens
5.2K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.2K
Improving Translational Accuracy
12.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
12.0K

