Myocardial function reclassification: Echocardiographic strain patterns in patients with chronic Chagas
Guilherme A T Athayde1, Bruno C C Borges2, Andreia O Pinheiro1
1Cardiac Stimulation Clinical Unit, Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
This study reclassified myocardial function in Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy (CCC) patients by analyzing global longitudinal strain (GLS) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (IVD) during rest and exercise, identifying subgroups with contractile reserve.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Myocardial mechanics
Background:
- Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy (CCC) patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) exhibit varied functional and mechanical patterns.
- Identifying distinct subgroups based on global longitudinal strain (GLS) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (IVD) is crucial for understanding CCC progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify subgroups of CCC patients with LVD and non-LBBB based on distinct GLS and IVD patterns at rest and during exercise.
- To reclassify myocardial function in these patients using a novel echocardiographic approach.
Main Methods:
- A single-center cross-sectional study involving 40 CCC patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and non-LBBB.
- Rest and treadmill exercise stress echocardiography were performed, analyzing GLS and IVD.
- Patients were categorized into four groups based on GLS and IVD variations between rest and exercise.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in baseline LVEF or GLS were observed among the four groups.
- The GLS-IVD+ group showed greater resting dyssynchrony (p=0.01).
- Significant differences in baseline left atrial volume and TAPSE were noted between groups. 67.5% of patients had very severe LVD, and 11 showed contractile reserve.
Conclusions:
- Echocardiographic evaluation of GLS and IVD during rest and exercise effectively reclassifies myocardial function in CCC patients.
- This approach identifies subgroups with contractile reserve and significant dyssynchronopathy, aiding in personalized treatment strategies.
Background:
We aimed to identify, among Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy (CCC) patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB), subgroups with different functional and mechanical patterns of global longitudinal strain (GLS) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (IVD) at rest and after exercise stress test, and reclassify them using a new echocardiographic approach.
Methodology:
In this single-center cross-sectional study, 40 patients with CCC, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and non-LBBB underwent rest echocardiography and then treadmill exercise stress echocardiography with GLS and IVD analysis. The sample was divided into four groups, based on GLS and IVD significant variation between rest and exercise: GLS + IVD+ (9 patients); GLS + IVD- (9 patients); GLS-IVD+ (10 patients); GLS-IVD- (10 patients).
Results:
At rest, median LVEF was 28% (21.3%-33%) and GLS (-7% (-5%/-9.3%), were not different among groups. The average response of GLS was an increase of 0.74% over rest values, and the average response of IVD was a decrease of 6.9 ms. Group GLS-IVD+ presented more dyssynchrony at rest (p = 0.01). Left atrial (LA) volume (higher in GLS-IVD-) (p = 0.022) and TAPSE (higher in GLS + IVD+) (p = 0.015) were also different among groups at baseline. Of the 40 patients evaluated, 27 (67.5%) had very severe LVD (GLS < -8%). In addition, among these patients, 11 patients had contractile reserve after undergoing stress echocardiography.
Conclusions:
In patients with CCC, severe LVD and non-LBBB, the evaluation of GLS and IVD between rest and exercise was able to reclassify myocardial function and to identify subgroups with contractile reserve and significant dyssynchronopathy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care


