Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.1K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.1K
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II01:19

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II

465
In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
465
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I01:15

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I

359
Consider an electrical power grid, where stability is essential to prevent blackouts. The Routh-Hurwitz criterion is a valuable tool for assessing system stability under varying load conditions or faults. By analyzing the closed-loop transfer function, the Routh-Hurwitz criterion helps determine whether the system remains stable.
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
359
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

28.5K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.5K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

3.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
3.0K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

74.0K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
74.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Traditional characters and Procrustes-aligned landmark data: a sensitivity analysis in morphological data type weighting for phylogenetic analyses.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2026
Same author

Searching for Phylogenetic Networks.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

The phylogenetic relationships of Bokermann´s treefrogs: species groups, reproductive biology, and biogeography (Anura: Hylidae: Bokermannohyla).

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2025
Same author

The limits of phylogenetic analysis: identifying analytical hallucinations.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2025
Same author

Phylogenetic minimum description length: an optimality criterion based on algorithmic complexity.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2025
Same author

Multi-armed bandits, Thomson sampling and unsupervised machine learning in phylogenetic graph search.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.4K

Dynamic homology and the likelihood criterion.

Ward C Wheeler1

  • 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA.

Cladistics : the International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society
|December 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study explores likelihood for dynamic homology analysis, enabling large dataset analysis with combined sequence and morphology data. It presents methods for maximum parsimony and average likelihood, with an arthropod systematics example.

More Related Videos

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions
11:22

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions

Published on: January 30, 2018

10.2K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.4K
Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions
11:22

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions

Published on: January 30, 2018

10.2K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Systematics
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Dynamic homology is crucial for evolutionary studies.
  • Analyzing large, variable-length sequence data with morphology presents challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore likelihood as an optimality criterion for dynamic homology.
  • To develop methods for analyzing combined sequence and morphological data.
  • To compare different likelihood interpretations and their congruence with parsimony.

Main Methods:

  • Development of simple models and procedures for large, variable-length sequence data analysis.
  • Integration of qualitative (morphological) information with sequence data.
  • Discussion of maximum parsimony likelihood and maximum average likelihood approaches.
  • Implementation and presentation of an example in arthropod systematics.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated feasibility of using likelihood for dynamic homology.
  • Successful analysis of combined sequence and morphological data.
  • Comparison of different likelihood methods and their topological congruence with parsimony.

Conclusions:

  • Likelihood provides a robust framework for dynamic homology.
  • The presented methods facilitate analysis of complex biological datasets.
  • Findings offer insights into arthropod systematics and phylogenetic inference.