Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Effect of Procedural Volume on In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic
Tsuyoshi Ito1, Kyohei Yamaji2, Shun Kohsaka3
1Department of Cardiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Insights
Higher institutional volume for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is linked to better in-hospital outcomes. Focusing on institutional CKD-PCI volume can improve decision-making for revascularization in these high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Nephrology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly elevates the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common revascularization strategy, but outcomes may vary based on institutional experience, especially in CKD patients.
- Understanding the relationship between institutional PCI volume and clinical outcomes in CKD patients is crucial for optimizing care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between the annual institutional volume of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
- To evaluate the impact of institutional CKD-PCI volume on in-hospital clinical outcomes, including death and periprocedural complications.
- To determine if higher institutional volume correlates with improved procedural characteristics and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a Japanese nationwide registry data from 2014-2018, including 1,199,901 PCI procedures.
- Focus on 220,509 patients with CKD, categorized into quartiles based on mean annual institutional CKD-PCI volume.
- Primary outcome: composite of in-hospital death and periprocedural complications. Secondary analysis of procedural characteristics like device use, contrast volume, access site, and door-to-balloon time.
Main Results:
- Higher institutional CKD-PCI volume was associated with significantly lower rates of the primary composite outcome (3.4% in Q1 vs. 2.4% in Q4, p <0.001).
- Institutions with the highest PCI volume demonstrated improved procedural efficiency, including lower contrast use, higher radial access rates, and shorter door-to-balloon times for STEMI.
- An inverse relationship was observed: higher institutional CKD-PCI volume correlated with reduced odds of adverse in-hospital events (OR for Q4 vs. Q1: 0.76 [0.84 to 0.97]).
Conclusions:
- Institutional volume of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) significantly influences procedural characteristics and in-hospital outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
- Higher-volume institutions are associated with better clinical results and procedural efficiency in CKD patients undergoing PCI.
- Institutional CKD-PCI volume should be a key consideration in clinical decision-making for revascularization strategies in patients with CKD.
Abstract:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of death and other poor outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. This study investigated the relation between the institutional CKD percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume and in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients with CKD. Among 1,199,901 patients who underwent PCI in 2014 to 2018 from the Japanese nationwide registry, we analyzed 220,509 patients with CKD. Patients were classified into quartiles (Q) according to the mean annual institutional CKD-PCI volume (Q1 <42 PCIs/year, Q2 <74 PCIs/year, Q3 <124 PCIs/year, Q4 ≥125 PCIs/year). The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death and periprocedural complications. The mean age of patients was 73 ± 10 years, and 36% (n = 78,332) were on dialysis. PCI was more likely to be performed with rotational atherectomy devices in high-volume institutions. Contrast volume was lower, the rate of radial access PCI was higher, and door-to-balloon time (for ST-elevation myocardial infarction) was shorter in the highest quartile institutions. Primary outcomes were observed in 6,539 patients (3.0%). The crude rate of the primary outcome was lowest in institutions with the highest PCI volume (Q1 3.4%, Q2 3.0%, Q3 3.0%, Q4 2.4%, p <0.001); higher PCI volume was associated with reduced frequency of the primary outcome (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] relative to Q1:Q2, 0.89 [0.83 to 0.96]; Q3 0.90 [0.84 to 0.97]; and Q4 0.76 [0.84 to 0.97]). In conclusion, the procedural characteristics and outcomes of PCI differed significantly by institutional volume in patients with CKD. When considering revascularization among these patients, institutional CKD-PCI volume needs to be incorporated in decision-making.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations

