Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

1.5K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
1.5K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

515
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
515
Hearing01:31

Hearing

53.8K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
53.8K
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

4.8K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
4.8K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

655
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
655
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

47.0K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
47.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Infant cortical tracking of speech shows emerging spatial release from masking in the first year of life.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Quantifying the Influence of Lexical Surprisal on Acoustic Speech Encoding While Controlling for Within-Speaker Variability.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Correction: Appropriate data segmentation improves speech encoding models: Analysis and simulation of electrophysiological recordings.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Infant cortical tracking of speech shows emerging spatial release from masking in the first year of life.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Chimeric Music Reveals an Interaction of Pitch and Time in Electrophysiological Signatures of Music Encoding.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Leveraging meaning-induced neural dynamics to detect covert cognition via EEG during natural language listening-a case series.

Frontiers in psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

577

Attention Differentially Affects Acoustic and Phonetic Feature Encoding in a Multispeaker Environment.

Emily S Teoh1, Farhin Ahmed2, Edmund C Lalor3,2

  • 1School of Engineering, Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|December 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Human attention enhances phonetic feature processing, not acoustic processing, during speech perception. This clarifies how the brain processes attended speech in noisy environments, like the "cocktail party" effect.

Keywords:
EEGattentioncocktail partyspeech

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.7K
Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

577
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.7K
Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Selective attention allows focusing on one speaker amidst competing sounds.
  • Neural mechanisms of auditory attention, particularly in speech, are not fully understood.
  • Debate exists on whether attention acts early or late in speech processing hierarchy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how attention differentially affects neural representations of acoustic and linguistic speech.
  • Examine the stage at which attention influences speech processing.
  • Identify neural correlates of speech processing at various hierarchical levels.

Main Methods:

  • Used electroencephalography (EEG) in fourteen human subjects during a "cocktail party" attention experiment.
  • Applied encoding models to identify neural correlates of speech processing.
  • Compared models to differentiate effects on acoustic vs. phonetic processing.

Main Results:

  • Phonetic feature processing was observed for attended speech, but not for unattended speech.
  • Attention specifically enhanced indices of phonetic feature processing.
  • Attention effects were not apparent for isolated measures of acoustic processing.

Conclusions:

  • Attention enhances the processing of phonetic features, a distinct stage separate from acoustic processing.
  • Findings support a hierarchical model where phonetic features are processed distinctly for attended speech.
  • Provides new insights into the neural basis of solving the "cocktail party problem".