Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Importance of Jumping Ability in Handball Throwing Speed and Accuracy
Published on: April 4, 2025
Joint and segment sequencing and its relationship to ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in professional pitchers
Joseph E Manzi1, Brittany Dowling2, Zhaorui Wang1
1Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Background:
Temporal variations during the pitch have demonstrated significant impacts on the kinetic chain, and as such, have implications in injury risk.
Purpose:
To determine the effect of varying chronological orders of maximum joint and segment velocities on ball velocity and upper extremity kinetics.
Methods:
Professional baseball pitchers (n = 287) were assessed with 3D-motion capture (480 Hz) while pitching. Pitches were categorized into one of the following groups dependent on the first maximum joint or segment velocity achieved out of chronological order in an inferior to superior direction: knee extension (DscK), pelvis rotation (DscP), trunk rotation (DscT), shoulder rotation (DscS), forearm pronation (DscF), and Proper (for pitchers with the correct temporal sequence), and Total Population, for all pitchers. Ten normalized throwing arm kinetic variables were compared among groups. Regression analysis was conducted on the timing of maximum velocities with ball velocity.
Results:
The majority of pitches were in the DscK group (64.5%). The DscK group had a significantly slower maximum lead knee extension velocity compared with the Proper group (253°/s vs. 316°/s, P = .017). The Proper group had a significantly faster ball velocity compared with the Total Population (39.0 ± 1.9 m/s vs. 38.3 ± 2.1 m/s, P = .013). The DscP group had a significantly slower maximum pelvis rotation velocity compared with the Proper group (596°/s vs. 698°/s, P < .001). The Proper group had no significant difference in kinetics relative to the population. For every 1 standard deviation delay in attaining maximum lead knee extension velocity, ball velocity increased by 0.38 m/s (B = 3.5, β = 0.18, P < .001). For every 1 standard deviation delay in timing to achieve maximum pelvis rotation velocity, maximum pelvis rotation velocity and ball velocity increased by 22.5°/s (B = 1107.0, β = 0.23, P < .001) and 0.48 m/s (B = 23.4, β = 0.23, P < .001), respectively.
Conclusion:
Pitchers with a discordant sequence of knee extension and pelvis rotation velocity timing had significantly slower corresponding segment/joint velocities. Conversely, pitchers with a proper sequence had the fastest ball velocity with minimal differences in throwing arm kinetics. To maximize ball velocity, professional pitchers should consider achieving maximal velocities in an inferior to superior chronological sequence, with a particular focus on the knee and pelvis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Motion of a Projectile
Horizontal motion, governed by the initial kick, maintains a constant velocity throughout the flight of the soccer ball.
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Projectile Motion: Equations
Any projectile motion problem can be solved by using the following strategy:
Relating Angular And Linear Quantities - I
When comparing the linear and rotational variables individually, the linear variable of position has physical units of meters, whereas the angular position variable has dimensionless units of radians, as it is the ratio of two lengths. The linear velocity...
Projectile Motion
When an object falls under gravity and has no...
Projectile Motion: Example
When we speak of the range (R) of a projectile on...

