Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Explaining discrepancies between longitudinal and cross-sectional models.

T A Louis, J Robins, D W Dockery

    Journal of Chronic Diseases
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Every Person Counts in a Fair Transition to Net Zero: A UK Food Lens Towards Safeguarding Against Nutritional Vulnerability.

    Nutrition bulletin·2025
    Same author

    Meat and the future of sustainable diets-Challenges and opportunities.

    Nutrition bulletin·2024
    Same author

    Temporary screw epiphyseodesis of the first metatarsal for correction of juvenile hallux valgus.

    Journal of children's orthopaedics·2018
    Same author

    Management of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Principles and Current Practice in the United Kingdom.

    JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association·2016
    Same author

    Perceived helpfulness of the individual components of a behavioural weight loss program: results from the Hopkins POWER Trial.

    Obesity science & practice·2016
    Same author

    Impact of a person-centred dementia care training programme on hospital staff attitudes, role efficacy and perceptions of caring for people with dementia: A repeated measures study.

    International journal of nursing studies·2015
    Same journal

    LEPROMATOUS LEPROSY AND AUSTRALIA ANTIGEN WITH COMMENTS ON THE GENETICS OF LEPROSY.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN AN ADULT DIABETIC POPULATION.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    ESSENTIAL TRACE METALS IN MAN: MOLYBDENUM.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    DISTINGUISHING PHYSIOLOGIC VARIATION FROM ANALYTIC VARIATION.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    THE PRE-THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION OF CO-MORBIDITY IN CHRONIC DISEASE.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    AORTITIS SYNDROME WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS CLINICAL PICTURE AND ETIOLOGY.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    See all related articles

    Cross-sectional and longitudinal study analyses can yield different results, especially when age effects are non-linear. Discrepancies arise from modeling choices and the age distribution, impacting the validity of cross-sectional change estimates.

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Epidemiology
    • Gerontology

    Background:

    • Longitudinal studies allow both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
    • Discrepancies between these analytical approaches raise concerns about the validity of cross-sectional estimates of change.
    • Potential causes include period effects, cohort effects, selective dropout, or incomplete statistical modeling.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate discrepancies between cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
    • To determine how non-linear relationships with age and age distribution affect these estimates.
    • To assess the validity of cross-sectional estimates of change in aging research.

    Main Methods:

    • Mathematical modeling of age effects in longitudinal data.
    • Analysis of continuous-time models with Gaussian and symmetric age distributions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal estimates under linear and non-linear (quadratic) age-effect assumptions.
  • Application to prospective longitudinal data on pulmonary function in middle and old age.

    • Main Results:

    • When the true age-dependent relationship is non-linear but modeled as linear, estimated age effects depend on the age distribution.
    • Cross-sectional and longitudinal estimates agree if the age distribution is Gaussian or symmetric with a quadratic non-linearity.
    • Discrepancies occur when these specific conditions are not met, indicating potential spurious findings.

    Conclusions:

    • The validity of cross-sectional estimates of change is questionable when the underlying age-related process is non-linear and incompletely modeled.
    • The age distribution plays a critical role in reconciling cross-sectional and longitudinal findings.
    • Careful consideration of statistical models and age distributions is essential for accurate interpretation of longitudinal study data.