Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: July 24, 2019
Self-Report versus Clinician Examination in Early Parkinson's Disease
Sheida Zolfaghari1,2, Alessandra E Thomann3, Natalia Lewandowski4
1Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Background:
Evaluating the discrepancies between patient-reported measures and clinician examination has implications for formulating individual treatment regimens.
Objective:
This study investigated the association between health outcomes and level of self-reported motor-related function impairment relative to clinician-examined motor signs.
Methods:
Recently diagnosed PD patients were evaluated using the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI, N = 420) and the PASADENA phase II clinical trial (N = 316). We calculated the average normalized difference between each participant's part II and III MDS-UPDRS (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) scores. Individuals with score differences <25th or >75th percentiles were labeled as low- and high-self-reporters, respectively (those between ranges were labeled intermediate-self-reporters). We compared a wide range of clinical/biomarker readouts among these three groups, using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric and Pearson's χ2 tests. Spearman's correlations were tested for associations between MDS-UPDRS subscales.
Results:
In both cohorts, high-self-reporters reported the largest impairment/symptom experience for most motor and nonmotor patient-reported variables. By contrast, these high-self-reporters were similar to or less impaired on clinician-examined and biomarker measures. Patient-reported nonmotor symptoms on MDS-UPDRS part IB showed the strongest positive correlation with self-reported motor-related impairment (PPMI rs = 0.54, PASADENA rs = 0.52). This correlation was numerically stronger than the part II and clinician-examined MDS-UPDRS part III correlation (PPMI rs = 0.38, PASADENA rs = 0.28).
Conclusion:
Self-reported motor-related impairments reflect not only motor signs/symptoms but also other self-reported nonmotor measures. This may indicate (1) a direct impact of nonmotor symptoms on motor-related functioning and/or (2) the existence of general response tendencies in how patients self-rate symptoms. Our findings suggest further investigation into the suitability of MDS-UPDRS II to assess motor-related impairments. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
More Related Videos
07:26Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking
Published on: September 26, 2019
02:28Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Parkinson's Disease: Overview
Neural Regulation
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Parkinson's Disease: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease is primarily a result of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The cornerstone of...