Quantification Method and Training Load Changes in High School Cross-Country Runners Across a Competitive Season

Running programs traditionally monitor external loads (eg, time and distance). Recent efforts have encouraged a more comprehensive approach to also account for internal loads (eg, intensity, measured as the session rating of perceived exertion [sRPE]). The combination of external and internal loads accounts for the possible interaction between these loads. Although weekly changes in training loads have been reported between external loads and the combination of external and internal loads during 2- and 4-week training cycles, no authors have indicated whether these differences occur during an entire cross-country season in high school runners.

To compare changes in training loads, as measured by (1) external loads and (2) combined external and internal loads in high school runners during an interscholastic cross-country season.

Case series.

Community-based setting with daily online surveys.

Twenty-four high school cross-country runners (females = 14, males = 10, age = 15.9 ± 1.1 years, running experience = 9.9 ± 3.2 years).

Week-to-week percentage changes in training load were measured by external loads (time, distance) and combined external and internal loads (time × sRPE [timeRPE] and distance × sRPE [distanceRPE]).

Overall, the average weekly change was 7.1% greater for distanceRPE than for distance (P = .04, d = 0.18). When the weekly running duration decreased, we found the average weekly change was 5.2% greater for distanceRPE than for timeRPE (P = .03, d = 0.24). When the weekly running duration was maintained or increased, the average weekly change was 10% to 15% greater when external and internal loads were combined versus external loads alone, but these differences were nonsignificant (P = .11-.22, d = 0.19-0.34).

Progression in the training load may be underestimated when relying solely on external loads. The interaction between internal loads (sRPE) and external loads (distance or time) appears to provide a different measure of the training stresses experienced by runners than external loads alone.