Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

334
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
334
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

20
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
20
Correlations02:20

Correlations

34.5K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
34.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.4K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

39
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
39
Correlation01:09

Correlation

12.8K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
12.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DISTANCE DATA REVISITED.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

THE PATTERN OF CLADISTICS.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

DISTANCES AND STATISTICS.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

HENNIG DEFINED PARAPHYLY.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

PHENETICS IN CAMOUFLAGE.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.3K

Corroboration versus "Strongest Evidence".

James S Farris1

  • 1Molekyläaursystematiska laboratoriet, Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Box 50007, SE-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden.

Cladistics : the International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society
|December 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Background knowledge in phylogenetics should include accepted theories, not rejected ones or null models. This ensures character data remains relevant for inferring evolutionary relationships and corroborating hypotheses.

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

577
Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections
07:28

Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections

Published on: May 19, 2022

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.3K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

577
Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections
07:28

Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections

Published on: May 19, 2022

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Phylogenetics
  • Systematic biology

Background:

  • Accepted theories are crucial for interpreting evidence in hypothesis corroboration.
  • Rejected theories, false assumptions, or null models should not be part of background knowledge.
  • Treating characters as randomly distributed due to homoplasy invalidates phylogenetic inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the role of background knowledge in phylogenetic hypothesis corroboration.
  • To address the misconception of using null models or random distributions as background knowledge.
  • To reconcile the concepts of corroboration, likelihood, and parsimony in phylogenetics.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of background knowledge in phylogenetic inference.
  • Critique of methods that assume random character distribution (e.g., clique analysis).
  • Comparison of corroboration, likelihood, and parsimony principles.

Main Results:

  • Background knowledge must consist of well-corroborated theories, not null models.
  • Phylogenetic characters, even with homoplasy, possess structure relevant to phylogeny.
  • Clique analysis is unjustified due to its reliance on flawed assumptions about homoplasy.
  • Most parsimonious trees are best corroborated, aligning with likelihood principles.

Conclusions:

  • Proper background knowledge is essential for valid phylogenetic corroboration.
  • Phylogenetic methods should account for character structure despite homoplasy.
  • Parsimony and likelihood methods are fundamentally compatible in corroborating phylogenetic hypotheses.