Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

10:42
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
6.6K
A Prospective Study to Examine Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences (MIDs) for the CLEFT-Q Scales
A Miroshnychenko1, C Rae2, K Wong Riff3
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Summary
The CLEFT-Q scales demonstrate responsiveness in assessing outcomes for cleft-related surgeries. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were estimated to help interpret patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after surgery.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Cleft lip and palate (CL/P) significantly impacts appearance and quality of life.
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial for evaluating surgical effectiveness.
- The CLEFT-Q is a PROM designed for individuals with CL/P.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the internal responsiveness of CLEFT-Q scales.
- To estimate minimally important differences (MIDs) for CLEFT-Q scales following cleft-related surgery.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study involving 7 cleft centers across North America and the UK.
- Participants (ages 8-29) with CL/P completed CLEFT-Q scales before and 6 months after surgery (rhinoplasty, orthognathic, or cleft lip scar revision).
- Internal responsiveness was assessed using Cohen's d effect sizes (ESs), and MIDs were estimated using distribution-based methods.
Main Results:
- Significant changes in CLEFT-Q scales were observed across all three surgical groups.
- Effect sizes varied by scale and surgery type, with notable responsiveness in scales related to the operated area (e.g., nose post-rhinoplasty, jaws post-orthognathic surgery).
- Estimated MIDs provide a quantitative threshold for interpreting meaningful change in CLEFT-Q scores.
Conclusions:
- The CLEFT-Q scales demonstrate good internal responsiveness for key outcomes in patients undergoing cleft-specific surgeries.
- The estimated MIDs offer valuable benchmarks for interpreting the clinical significance of changes in CLEFT-Q scores.
- This study supports the utility of CLEFT-Q as a reliable PROM for evaluating treatment outcomes in CL/P patients.

