Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
Published on: February 20, 2019
Static and dynamic topological organizations of the costly punishment network predict individual differences in
Ting Li1, Yuping Yang1, Frank Krueger2,3
1Institute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University, 510631 Guangzhou, China.
Abstract:
Human costly punishment plays a vital role in maintaining social norms. Recently, a brain network model is conceptually proposed indicating that the implement of costly punishment depends on a subset of nodes in three high-level networks. This model, however, has not yet been empirically examined from an integrated perspective of large-scale brain networks. Here, we conducted comprehensive graph-based network analyses of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data to explore system-level characteristics of intrinsic functional connectivity among 18 regions related to costly punishment. Nontrivial organizations (small-worldness, connector hubs, and high flexibility) were found that were qualitatively stable across participants and over time but quantitatively exhibited low test-retest reliability. The organizations were predictive of individual costly punishment propensities, which was reproducible on independent samples and robust against different analytical strategies and parameter settings. Moreover, the prediction was specific to system-level network organizations (rather than interregional functional connectivity) derived from positive (rather than negative or combined) connections among the specific (rather than randomly chosen) subset of regions from the three high-order (rather than primary) networks. Collectively, these findings suggest that human costly punishment emerges from integrative behaviors among specific regions in certain functional networks, lending support to the brain network model for costly punishment.
Related Concept Videos
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Law of Effect
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
Attribution Theory

