Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
6.4K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.4K
Phylogeny
54.2K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
54.2K
Phylogenetic Trees
48.1K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
48.1K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
7.5K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
7.5K
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
242
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
242
Synteny and Evolution
3.4K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.4K
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Sort by
Same author
Early to Middle Holocene Hunter-Fisher-Gatherers From the Green Sahara (Gobero, Niger): Dental Evidence for Regional African Affinities.
American journal of biological anthropology·2026
Same author
Scimitar-crested <i>Spinosaurus</i> species from the Sahara caps stepwise spinosaurid radiation.
Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author
Duck-billed dinosaur fleshy midline and hooves reveal terrestrial clay-template "mummification".
Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

08:57
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
Published on: August 14, 2018
16.1K
Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics.
Cladistics : the International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society
|December 15, 2021
Summary
Systematists can now clarify character and character state definitions. This study proposes a unified framework for character statements, reducing variability in phylogenetic analyses.
Area of Science:
- Systematics
- Phylogenetics
- Morphological Data Analysis
Background:
- Discrepancies exist in the definitions of characters and character states among systematists.
- The alignment of these definitions with the concept of homology has been questioned.
- Previous definitions exhibit significant variation, leading to inconsistencies in analyses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To redefine characters and character states for clarity and consistency.
- To introduce a unified framework for understanding character statements.
- To resolve controversies in character coding and the use of "absent" states.
Main Methods:
- Defining characters as independent variables and character states as mutually exclusive conditions.
- Identifying four fundamental functional components of character statements: locator, variable, variable qualifier, and character state.
- Analyzing two fundamental patterns of character statements: neomorphic and transformational.
Main Results:
- Character statements are proposed to be composed of four functional components in two patterns.
- Incomplete or mixed character statements contribute to controversies in character coding and the use of "absent" states.
- A limited number of logically complete patterns for morphological character data have been identified.
Conclusions:
- Adopting logically complete character statement patterns can significantly reduce variability in phylogenetic analyses.
- The proposed framework clarifies the distinction between characters and character states.
- This standardization enhances the reliability and reproducibility of systematic research.

