Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Surgical Management of Meatal Stenosis with Meatoplasty
Published on: November 30, 2010
Broadening candidate office circumcision patients: A comparison of outcome in children based on age and weight
Lauren Nicassio1, Brett Klamer2, Molly Fuchs1
1Department of Pediatric Urology, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Insights
Office circumcision for infants outside the standard age and weight criteria did not increase complication risks. However, these infants experienced more unplanned hospital visits, suggesting a need for adjusted parental expectations regarding infant circumcision outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Surgical Outcomes
- Preventive Healthcare
Background:
- Office circumcision is commonly performed using clamp or Plastibell devices.
- Current practice often restricts these procedures to infants within specific age and weight limits (≤3 months and ≤5.1 kg) to minimize risks.
- These restrictions are based on the assumption that they ensure appropriate patient fit and reduce complication rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of office circumcisions in children meeting standard age and weight criteria (≤3 months and ≤5.1 kg) versus those exceeding these limits.
- To evaluate the incidence of complications, need for interventions, and unplanned hospital visits between the two groups.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective chart review of office circumcisions performed between January 2015 and August 2018.
- Patients were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (≤3 months old and ≤5.1 kg) and Group 2 (all other children ≤6 months).
- Outcomes including complications, interventions, and unplanned hospital visits were compared using Pearson's chi-square test.
Main Results:
- A total of 703 circumcisions were analyzed (205 in Group 1, 498 in Group 2).
- No significant differences were found in complication rates (p=0.08) or intervention rates (p=0.12) between the groups.
- Group 2 patients experienced significantly more unplanned hospital visits (p=0.02).
Conclusions:
- Performing office circumcisions in children exceeding the typical age and weight restrictions does not significantly increase the risk of complications or the need for interventions.
- Children outside these standard criteria had a higher rate of unplanned hospital visits post-procedure.
- Managing parental expectations may be necessary for infants undergoing circumcision outside the established age and weight guidelines.
Introduction:
Office circumcision with a clamp or Plastibell device is often restricted in practice by patient age and size. This is thought to ensure the patient fits appropriately on the restraining device and limit complications.
Objective:
To compare the outcomes of office circumcision in children ≤3 months of age and ≤5.1 kg in weight to those who do not fit this criterion.
Study Design:
A retrospective chart review was performed of all office circumcisions in children ≤6 months of age performed in our urology clinic between January 2015-August 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (≤3 months old and ≤5.1 kg) and Group 2 (all others). Patient demographics and circumcision technique were recorded. The number of patients with complications and requiring an intervention related to circumcision were compared between groups, as well as the number of patients requiring unplanned hospital visits. Differences in outcomes were evaluated using Pearson's chi-square test.
Results:
A total of 205 circumcisions were performed in Group 1 and 498 circumcisions were performed in Group 2. All circumcisions were performed by either Gomco clamp or Plastibell device with no significant difference in method between groups (p = 0.5). There was no difference in median follow-up between groups (Group 1: 19 days [IQR 14; 34]; Group 2: 19 days [IQR 14; 36]; p = 0.6). There were no significant differences between groups in the number patients with complications or requiring an intervention (p = 0.08 and p = 0.12, respectively). Significantly more patients in Group 2 required an unplanned hospital visit (p = 0.02) (Table). After categorizing those composing Group 2 into three disjoint sets (children >3 months and ≤5.1 kg, or ≤3 months and >5.1 kg, or >3 months and >5.1 kg), no significant difference across all four groups in regards to complications (p = 0.12) or intervention (p = 0.2) was found. There was a significant difference in unplanned hospital visits (p < 0.001).
Discussion:
Performing office circumcisions in children outside of age and weight restrictions of ≤3 months and ≤5.1 kg did not significantly increase the risk of complications or need for interventions. Those outside of age and weight restrictions, however, had more unplanned hospital visits. Tailoring parent expectations in this patient group may be needed.
Conclusions:
While we found older and heavier children had more unplanned post-procedural related hospital visits, their rates of overall complications and need for subsequent interventions were not significantly higher than younger and lighter children.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

