Medial gastrocnemius growth in children who are typically developing: Can changes in muscle volume and length be

Steven Obst1, Kaysie Florance1, Luke Heales2

  • 1School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia.

Journal of Anatomy
|December 16, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Age-predicted muscle growth in children significantly underestimates actual medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscle growth. Actual muscle volume and length were substantially greater than predicted, highlighting the need for personalized growth assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric physiology
  • Musculoskeletal development
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Muscle size is a key indicator of muscular fitness and overall health in children.
  • Accurate assessment of muscle growth is crucial for monitoring pediatric development and health.
  • Current methods for predicting muscle growth based on age may lack precision in young children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare actual muscle growth with age-predicted growth rates of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscle in young children over a 12-month period.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of age-based linear regression models in predicting pediatric muscle development.
  • To determine the discrepancy between predicted and actual muscle volume and length changes in children.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized three-dimensional ultrasound to measure medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscle length and volume in 50 children.
  • Established age-predicted muscle growth rates using least-squares linear regression based on initial measurements.
  • Tracked actual MG muscle growth (volume and length) over 6 and 12 months in a subset of 20 children.
  • Employed paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analysis to compare actual versus predicted growth.

Main Results:

  • Age-predicted MG muscle growth significantly underestimated actual growth for both muscle volume and length at all measured timepoints.
  • On average, actual muscle volume was 11.5% greater than age-predicted volume.
  • On average, actual muscle length was 21.5% greater than age-predicted length.
  • The study found significant discrepancies between predicted and actual pediatric muscle development.

Conclusions:

  • Age alone is an insufficient predictor of future muscle size in young children.
  • Current age-based growth prediction models may not accurately reflect individual pediatric muscle development.
  • Further research into personalized methods for assessing pediatric muscle growth is warranted.