Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

13.1K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.1K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

13.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
13.2K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

326
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
326
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

12.7K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
12.7K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

12.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
12.8K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

318
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
318

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are Semantic Representations Stable? A Bayesian Framework Applied to the Study of Quantifier Meaning.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Robust Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis: Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of dependent effect sizes.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Comparing variable selection and model averaging methods for logistic regression.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Comparing the reliability of individual differences for various measurement models in conflict tasks.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.6K

Evaluating multinomial order restrictions with bridge sampling.

Alexandra Sarafoglou1, Julia M Haaf1, Alexander Ly1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam.

Psychological Methods
|December 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed an efficient bridge sampling method for evaluating inequality constraints in multinomial proportions. This new approach outperforms existing Bayesian methods, particularly in complex scenarios with limited posterior mass.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.6K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Computational Statistics
  • Bayesian Inference

Background:

  • Standard statistical tests efficiently evaluate exact equality constraints in multinomial proportions.
  • Inequality constrained hypotheses in multinomial distributions require computationally expensive sampling-based methods.
  • Existing methods for inequality constraints are inefficient and resource-intensive for researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an efficient computational method for evaluating inequality constraints in multinomial proportions.
  • To introduce a bridge sampling routine specifically designed for multinomial inequality hypothesis testing.
  • To extend the method to accommodate mixed equality and inequality constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel bridge sampling routine tailored for multinomial distributions.
  • Implementation of the routine to efficiently evaluate inequality constraints.
  • Extension of the bridge sampling technique to handle hypotheses combining equality and inequality constraints.

Main Results:

  • The developed bridge sampling routine provides an efficient evaluation of multinomial inequality constraints.
  • Empirical applications demonstrate that bridge sampling surpasses current Bayesian methods in performance.
  • The method shows particular advantage when the restricted parameter space has limited posterior mass.

Conclusions:

  • Bridge sampling offers a computationally efficient and superior alternative for testing inequality constrained hypotheses in multinomial distributions.
  • The method simplifies complex hypothesis testing, making it more accessible for statistical research.
  • The extension to mixed constraints broadens the applicability of this efficient sampling technique.