Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025
Multiplexed Isothermal Amplification Based Diagnostic Platform to Detect Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue 1
Published on: March 13, 2018
Validation of the Early Warning and Response System (EWARS) for dengue outbreaks: Evidence from the national vector
David Benitez-Valladares1, Axel Kroeger2,3, Gustavo Sánchez Tejeda1
1Programa de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Vector, Centro Nacional de Programas Preventivos y Control de Enfermedades, CENAPRECE, Secretaría de Salud de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Background:
During 2017, twenty health districts (locations) implemented a dengue outbreak Early Warning and Response System (EWARS) in Mexico, which processes epidemiological, meteorological and entomological alarm indicators to predict dengue outbreaks and triggers early response activities. Out of the 20 priority districts where more than one fifth of all national disease transmission in Mexico occur, eleven districts were purposely selected and analyzed. Nine districts presented outbreak alarms by EWARS but without subsequent outbreaks ("non-outbreak districts") and two presented alarms with subsequent dengue outbreaks ("outbreak districts"). This evaluation study assesses and compares the impact of alarm-informed response activities and the consequences of failing a timely and adequate response across the outbreak groups.
Methods:
Five indicators of dengue outbreak response (larval control, entomological studies with water container interventions, focal spraying and indoor residual spraying) were quantitatively analyzed across two groups ("outbreak districts" and "non-outbreak districts"). However, for quality control purposes, only qualitative concluding remarks were derived from the fifth response indicator (fogging).
Results:
The average coverage of vector control responses was significantly higher in non-outbreak districts and across all four indicators. In the "outbreak districts" the response activities started late and were of much lower intensity compared to "non-outbreak districts". Vector control teams at districts-level demonstrated diverse levels of compliance with local guidelines for 'initial', 'early' and 'late' responses to outbreak alarms, which could potentially explain the different outcomes observed following the outbreak alarms.
Conclusion:
Failing timely and adequate response of alarm signals generated by EWARS showed to negatively impact the disease outbreak control process. On the other hand, districts with adequate and timely response guided by alarm signals demonstrated successful records of outbreak prevention. This study presents important operational scenarios when failing or successding EWARS but warrants investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of EWARS using a more robust designs.
