Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025
Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Less extensive surgery for patients with FIGO stage IA2 cervical cancer: A population-based study
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Objectives:
The objectives of this study were to study the feasibility of less extensive surgeries for stage IA2 cervical cancer and to examine the incidence of positive nodes in stage IA2 cervical cancer.
Methods:
Patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer treated surgically between 1998 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Overall survival (OS) and cervical cancer-specific survival (CCSS) were compared among patients who underwent different types of surgery (simple hysterectomy VS radical hysterectomy, lymphadenectomy VS without lymphadenectomy). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to evaluate multiple prognostic factors.
Results:
1343 patients were included in this study. The overall incidence of positive nodes in stage IA2 was 2.53%. For well-differentiated IA2 cervical cancer, the incidence of regional lymph node involvement was as low as 1.42%. Compared with patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, the patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy had the same OS (HR, 1.336; 95% CI, 0.923 to 1.933; P = 0.149) and CCSS (HR, 1.038; 95% CI, 0.504 to 2.140; P = 0.920). The log-rank test also indicated that simple hysterectomy was not associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.048; 95% CI, 0.750 to 1.466; P = 0.781) and CCSS (HR, 1.259; 95% CI, 0.655 to 2.420; P = 0.490). Multivariable analyses showed that lymphadenectomy and type of hysterectomy were not independent predictors of survival for patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer.
Conclusions:
The incidence of nodal involvement in well-differentiated stage IA2 cervical cancer was fairly low, lymphadenectomy may be omitted in these patients. The excision range of parametrial tissue was not associated with the oncological survival of women with stage IA2 cervical cancer, simple hysterectomy may be an appropriate alternative for this group of patients.
