Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

117
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
117

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in expectation impact multiple steps of the visual perceptual decision process in adults.

Physiological reports·2026
Same author

Perceptual Training in Ice Hockey: Bridging the Eyes-Puck Gap Using Virtual Reality.

Sports medicine - open·2025
Same author

It's not all in your feet: Improving penalty kick performance with human-avatar interaction and machine learning.

Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.))·2024
Same author

Controlling the trajectory of a moving object substantially shortens the latency of motor responses to visual stimuli.

iScience·2023
Same author

Preventing falls: the use of machine learning for the prediction of future falls in individuals without history of fall.

Journal of neurology·2022
Same author

Influence of mental workload on motion perception: A direct comparison of luminance-based and contrast-based stimuli.

Vision research·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches
10:50

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches

Published on: June 21, 2022

1.9K

Model Based or Model Free? Comparing Adaptive Methods for Estimating Thresholds in Neuroscience.

Julien Audiffren1, Jean-Pierre Bresciani2

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Fribourg University, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland julien.audiffren@unifr.ch.

Neural Computation
|December 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the right psychometric function estimation method is crucial for accurate human perception studies. Model-free methods outperform model-based ones when perception data deviates from ideal assumptions.

More Related Videos

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

5.8K
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches
10:50

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches

Published on: June 21, 2022

1.9K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

5.8K
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Experimental psychology
  • Psychophysics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Quantifying human perception via psychometric functions (Ψ) is central to psychophysics.
  • Estimating thresholds is key in neuroscience and cognitive psychology, with various adaptive procedures developed.
  • Existing procedures often rely on unvalidated mathematical assumptions about Ψ, impacting estimator accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of five common adaptive psychophysical threshold estimation procedures.
  • To evaluate how mathematical assumptions of these methods affect performance with varying psychometric function complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated experiments using five adaptive procedures: Dichotomous Optimistic Search (DOS), Staircase, PsiMethod, Gaussian Processes, and QuestPlus.
  • Comparison across psychometric functions of diverse complexity, including ideal and beta cumulative distribution functions.

Main Results:

  • Model-based methods (e.g., PsiMethod) excel with ideal psychometric functions.
  • Model-free methods (e.g., DOS) demonstrate superior performance when Ψ deviates from ideal models, such as with beta cumulative distribution functions.
  • The choice of method significantly impacts threshold estimation accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The accuracy of threshold estimation in psychophysics depends heavily on the chosen adaptive procedure and its underlying assumptions.
  • Model-free methods offer greater robustness when psychometric function shapes are complex or deviate from ideal models.
  • Careful selection of the appropriate method based on expected psychometric function characteristics is essential for reliable results.