Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.1K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.1K
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.6K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

12.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cuscuta chinensis Lam. extract alleviates ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis by inhibiting VCP-mediated METTL3 protein degradation.

Journal of molecular histology·2026
Same author

A dual-pronged strategy: multi-bioactive nanoplatform synergizes ROS antidote and iron stabilization to protect against liver ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026
Same author

A natural remedy: Kidney-targeting nanoplatform for photoacoustic imaging-guided three-in-one theranostics of rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury.

Materials today. Bio·2026
Same author

Hyaluronic acid engineered melanin-MOF nanoreactor synergistically remodeling redox and immune homeostasis for targeted acute lung injury therapy.

Materials today. Bio·2026
Same author

Urinary microenvironment-degradable nanocapsules for traceable therapy of diabetic nephropathy.

Materials today. Bio·2026
Same author

Early characterization of pregnancy glycemic traits in gestational diabetes mellitus by plasma cell-free mRNA and non-coding RNA.

Epigenetics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
09:45

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

11.8K

CNV-P: a machine-learning framework for predicting high confident copy number variations.

Taifu Wang1, Jinghua Sun1,2, Xiuqing Zhang1,2,3

  • 1BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.

Peerj
|December 17, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces CNV-P, a machine learning tool that significantly reduces false positives in copy-number variant (CNV) detection from genome sequencing. CNV-P enhances the accuracy of identifying genetic disorders for improved research and clinical diagnosis.

Keywords:
Copy number variantGenome sequencingMachine learning

More Related Videos

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
09:30

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

3.2K
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

19.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
09:45

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

11.8K
Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
09:30

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

3.2K
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

19.8K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Copy-number variants (CNVs) are a significant cause of genetic disorders.
  • Accurate CNV detection from genome sequencing is crucial for disease research.
  • Existing CNV detection software suffers from high false-positive rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel post-processing approach, CNV-P, for improving CNV detection accuracy.
  • To reduce false-positive fragments identified by existing CNV detection tools.
  • To enhance the reliability of CNV analysis in genetic disorder research.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a machine-learning framework named CNV-P.
  • Utilized features such as read depth (RD), split reads (SR), and read pairs (RP) around putative CNV fragments.
  • Trained a classifier to distinguish true CNVs from false positives.

Main Results:

  • Achieved over 90% precision and 85% recall rates in classifying CNVs on real biological datasets.
  • Demonstrated significant performance improvement compared to state-of-the-art algorithms.
  • Showed robustness of CNV-P across different CNV sizes and sequencing platforms.

Conclusions:

  • The CNV-P framework effectively classifies high-confidence CNVs.
  • This advancement can improve both basic research and clinical diagnosis of genetic diseases.
  • Enhanced accuracy in CNV detection facilitates a better understanding of genetic disorder etiology.