Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jef Van den Eynde1,2, Michel Pompeu Sá3,4, Senne De Groote1
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Insights
Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) may be a viable alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multivessel coronary artery disease. HCR showed lower rates of myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization in a recent meta-analysis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines surgical and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) benefits for multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD).
- HCR aims to improve long-term outcomes while reducing short-term complications and recovery time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of HCR compared to PCI in patients with MVD.
- To compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) between HCR and PCI at 30 days and latest follow-up.
Main Methods:
- Systematic database search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL/CCTR up to June 2021.
- Random-effects meta-analysis comparing HCR versus PCI outcomes.
- Inclusion of seven studies with 27,041 patients (939 HCR, 26,102 PCI) published between 2013 and 2021.
Main Results:
- At latest follow-up, HCR was associated with significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 0.40) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.49).
- The difference in MACCE between HCR and PCI did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.46).
- No significant differences were observed in 30-day outcomes, mortality, or stroke rates at latest follow-up.
Conclusions:
- HCR presents a potentially valid alternative to multivessel PCI for MVD.
- Lower MI and TVR incidence with HCR suggests potential benefits.
- Optimal patient selection, heart team coordination, and center experience are crucial for successful HCR outcomes.
Background:
Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is an emerging approach for multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) which combines the excellent long-term outcomes of surgery with the early recovery and reduced short-term complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here, we evaluated the effectiveness of HCR compared to PCI in patients with MVD.
Methods:
A systematic database search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL/CCTR was conducted by June 2021. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, comparing major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days and at latest follow-up between patients undergoing HCR versus PCI.
Results:
A total of 27,041 patients (HCR: 939 patients, PCI: 26,102 patients) were included from seven studies published between 2013 and 2021. At latest follow-up, HCR was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, p = 0.010) and target vessel revascularization (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.64, p < 0.001), while the difference for MACCE did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20-1.05, p = 0.061). No differences were observed in terms of 30-day outcomes, nor rates of mortality or stroke at latest follow-up.
Conclusions:
HCR might be a valid alternative to multivessel PCI, demonstrating a lower incidence of MI and TVR. Center experience, well-coordinated heart team discussions, and good patient selection likely remain essential to ensure optimal outcomes. Future comparative studies are required to define the optimal target population.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures