Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Determining the Contribution of the Energy Systems During Exercise
Published on: March 20, 2012
Bi-exponential modelling of reconstitution kinetics in trained cyclists
Alan Chorley1, Richard P Bott2, Simon Marwood3
1Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Chester, Chester, CH1 4BJ, UK. a.chorley@chester.ac.uk.
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to investigate the individual reconstitution kinetics of trained cyclists following repeated bouts of incremental ramp exercise, and to determine an optimal mathematical model to describe reconstitution.
Methods:
Ten trained cyclists (age 41 ± 10 years; mass 73.4 ± 9.9 kg; 58.6 ± 7.1 mL kg min-1) completed three incremental ramps (20 W min-1) to the limit of tolerance with varying recovery durations (15-360 s) on 5-9 occasions. reconstitution was measured following the first and second recovery periods against which mono-exponential and bi-exponential models were compared with adjusted R2 and bias-corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc).
Results:
A bi-exponential model outperformed the mono-exponential model of reconstitution (AICc 30.2 versus 72.2), fitting group mean data well (adjR2 = 0.999) for the first recovery when optimised with parameters of fast component (FC) amplitude = 50.67%; slow component (SC) amplitude = 49.33%; time constant (τ)FC = 21.5 s; τSC = 388 s. Following the second recovery, W' reconstitution reduced by 9.1 ± 7.3%, at 180 s and 8.2 ± 9.8% at 240 s resulting in an increase in the modelled τSC to 716 s with τFC unchanged. Individual bi-exponential models also fit well (adjR2 = 0.978 ± 0.017) with large individual parameter variations (FC amplitude 47.7 ± 17.8%; first recovery: (τ)FC = 22.0 ± 11.8 s; (τ)SC = 377 ± 100 s; second recovery: (τ)FC = 16.3.0 ± 6.6 s; (τ)SC = 549 ± 226 s).
Conclusions:
W' reconstitution kinetics were best described by a bi-exponential model consisting of distinct fast and slow phases. The amplitudes of the FC and SC remained unchanged with repeated bouts, with a slowing of W' reconstitution confined to an increase in the time constant of the slow component.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Three-Compartment Open Model
Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Bolus Administration
The disparity between drug input and the sum of drug transfer rates between...
Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration
The absorption exponent (ka) indicates the speed at which the drug...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Michaelis-Menten Equation
Vmax represents the maximum achievable process rate, while KM, known as the Michaelis constant, signifies the drug concentration at which the process rate reaches half its maximum. This relationship between Vmax, KM, and Cp gives rise to three distinct...

