The effects of adding high-intensity of effort resistance training to routine care in persons with type II diabetes:...

This study considered the effects of supervised, low volume, high intensity of effort resistance training compared to continued routine care in persons with type II diabetes.

We utilized a randomized parallel-group time-series design. All participants completed baseline testing (T0) and then participated in an educational training intervention regarding the management of their diabetes and were followed up for six months, during which they received routine care before being retested (T1). Participants were then randomly allocated to either continue with routine care (CON) or receive the high intensity of effort resistance training intervention (HIT). Participants from both groups were retested again after six months (T2). All participants were followed up for a further 12 months before being finally tested (T3). Data were available from 57 participants who completed the whole duration of the study (HIT, n = 29; CON, n = 28) for measures of anthropometry (body mass, waist circumference, and BMI), body composition (body fat mass, body fat percentage, lean mass, and visceral fat mass), total body water, phase angle, HbA1c, fasted blood glucose, and subjective wellbeing (WHO-5).

During the initial 6-months of routine care significant improvements were noted for waist circumference, body fat mass, lean mass, body fat percentage, lean mass percentage, visceral fat mass, HbA1c, fasted blood glucose, and subjective wellbeing. During the successive 6-months (intervention) and 18-months (follow-up), data suggest that many of these positive changes during the initial 6-months were negated or reversed for CON. In contrast, participants engaging in HIT continued to show positive changes for waist circumference, body fat mass, lean mass, body fat percentage, lean mass percentage, and visceral fat. For blood markers and wellbeing, HbA1c continued to decrease, fasted blood glucose decreased, and subjective wellbeing continued to increase. These positive responses were still evidenced and significantly different compared to CON after the 12-month follow-up.

The results of this exploratory pragmatic trial suggest that the addition of high intensity of effort RT alongside routine care can have a positive impact on a range of outcomes in type 2 diabetics having undergone prior routine care.