Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Faculty Versus Resident Self-Assessment Using Pathology Milestones: How Aligned Are We?
Sienna Athy1, Geoffrey Talmon2, Kaeli Samson3
1Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Medical residents’ self-assessments of their skills often differ from expert evaluations. Discrepancies vary by training year and specialty, offering insights for improving physician self-assessment and training.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Physician Training
- Self-Assessment Accuracy
Background:
- Physician competence requires accurate self-assessment skills.
- Previous research indicates medical trainees may struggle with accurate self-assessment.
- Pathology Milestones (PM) data provides a framework for evaluating trainee competency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate discrepancies between resident self-evaluations and Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) ratings.
- To analyze how these discrepancies vary by sex, postgraduate year (PGY), evaluation timing, and specific competency categories.
- To explore the relationship between discrepancies and Residency In-Service Examination (RISE) scores.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of PM evaluation scores from 2016-2019 for 23 pathology residents.
- Data collected twice annually, comparing resident self-ratings against CCC ratings.
- Discrepancy scores calculated by subtracting CCC scores from self-evaluation scores.
Main Results:
- No significant sex-based differences in self-assessment discrepancies were observed.
- Significant differences in discrepancy scores were found across postgraduate years (PGY), with early-year residents overrating and later-year residents underrating themselves.
- Residents tended to underrate themselves in January evaluations and overrate in July evaluations.
- Systems-Based Practice (SBP) showed lower self-ratings compared to CCC, while Professionalism (PRO) showed higher self-ratings.
- Higher RISE scores correlated with improved self- and CCC-based scoring.
Conclusions:
- Significant discrepancies exist between resident self-assessment and expert evaluation in pathology training.
- Training year and evaluation timing are key factors influencing self-assessment accuracy.
- Understanding these discrepancies can guide targeted interventions, such as curriculum refinement and clearer competency framework definitions, to enhance physician self-awareness and professional development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...

