Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

06:00
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
Published on: October 1, 2011
14.1K
EVOLUTIONARY ORIGIN OF THE CYCLORRHAPHA (DIPTERA): TEST OF ALTERNATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL HYPOTHESES
Brian M Wiegmann1, Charles Mitter1, F Christian Thompson2
1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, U.S.A.
Cladistics : the International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society
|December 21, 2021
Summary
The study on higher flies (Cyclorrhapha) found they likely originated within the Empidoidea, regardless of male genitalia interpretations. However, adult morphology alone may not definitively resolve their exact placement or the homology debate.
Area of Science:
- Entomology
- Systematics
- Evolutionary Biology
Background:
- The phylogenetic placement of higher flies (infraorder Cyclorrhapha) is a long-standing problem in dipteran systematics due to rapid morphological evolution.
- Two main hypotheses exist: Cyclorrhapha as sister to Empidoidea or within Empidoidea, with debates often focusing on male genitalia homology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively analyze all available morphological evidence to resolve the phylogenetic origin of Cyclorrhapha.
- To evaluate the impact of different interpretations of male genitalic homology on phylogenetic placement.
- To determine if adult morphological data are sufficient to settle these systematic debates.
Main Methods:
- Cladistic analysis of morphological data, including alternative codings for male genitalic features.
- Analysis excluding genitalic features to assess their impact.
- Factorial design analog to test effects of character transformation series, outgroup choice, and successive weighting.
Main Results:
- Under all analyses, Cyclorrhapha consistently originated within Empidoidea, near the family Atelestidae.
- Constraining Empidoidea to be monophyletic resulted in trees only slightly longer, suggesting a non-significant difference.
- The debate over genitalic homology did not critically affect the placement of Cyclorrhapha.
Conclusions:
- Adult morphological data may be insufficient to definitively resolve the precise phylogenetic placement of Cyclorrhapha or the genitalic homology debate.
- The origin of Cyclorrhapha within Empidoidea is robust across different analytical manipulations, including varying genitalic interpretations.
Related Concept Videos
Limits to Natural Selection
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.For one, natural selection can only act upon existing genetic variation. Hypothetically, redtusks may enhance elephant survival by deterring ivory-seeking poachers. However, if there are no gene variants—or alleles—for redtusks, natural selection cannot increase the prevalence of...
The Evidence for Evolution
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.
Convergent Evolution
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.The structures that arise from convergent evolution are called analogous structures. They are similar in function even if they are dissimilar in structure. Further, structures can be analogous while also...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...

