Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Microsampling in Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Analysis of Low-Abundance Proteins
Published on: January 13, 2023
Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers
Matthias Kaiser1, Laura Drivdal2, Johs Hjellbrekke3
1Center for the Study of the Sciences and Humanities, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Matthias.kaiser@uib.no.
Research integrity in Norway reveals low fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (FFP) rates (0.2-0.3%). However, 40% of researchers reported engaging in questionable research practices (QRPs), highlighting a significant concern in scientific conduct.
Area of Science:
- Scientific research ethics
- Norwegian research landscape
Background:
- The Research Integrity in Norway (RINO) project surveyed Norwegian researchers in 2018.
- Understanding the prevalence and attitudes towards research misconduct is crucial for maintaining scientific integrity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze survey data on the prevalence of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (FFP) and questionable research practices (QRPs) among Norwegian researchers.
- To compare attitudes towards and prevalence of FFP versus QRPs.
- To rank the perceived severity of FFP and QRPs within the research community.
Main Methods:
- National survey conducted in 2018.
- 31,206 questionnaires emailed to Norwegian researchers.
- 7,291 responses analyzed.
Main Results:
- Self-reported fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (FFP) rates were low, between 0.2% and 0.3%.
- A significant 40% of researchers reported engaging in at least one questionable research practice (QRP) in the past three years.
- FFP is perceived as more severe than QRPs by the majority of Norwegian researchers.
Conclusions:
- While overt research misconduct (FFP) is infrequent, questionable research practices (QRPs) are prevalent among Norwegian researchers.
- A strong normative consensus exists, with FFP viewed as more serious than QRPs.
- Findings underscore the need to address both overt misconduct and the broader spectrum of questionable research practices to uphold research integrity.
More Related Videos
05:57Long-term Video Tracking of Cohoused Aquatic Animals: A Case Study of the Daily Locomotor Activity of the Norway Lobster Nephrops norvegicus
Published on: April 8, 2019
10:33Multi-locus Variable-number Tandem-repeat Analysis of the Fish-pathogenic Bacterium Yersinia ruckeri by Multiplex PCR and Capillary Electrophoresis
Published on: June 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Blind Procedures
Obedience
Longitudinal Research