Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Taxonomy01:31

Taxonomy

80.4K
Taxonomy is the science of defining and naming groups of biological organisms based on shared characteristics. It uses a hierarchy of increasingly inclusive categories with Latin names. The smallest units of taxonomy, species and genus, are used to assign a formal, taxonomic name to each species in a system. This classification system, referred to as binomial nomenclature, was formalized by Carolus Linnaeus in the 18th century.
Hierarchy of Taxonomy
The hierarchy that Carolus Linnaeus first...
80.4K
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

48.1K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
48.1K
Microbial Classification System01:24

Microbial Classification System

280
Classification is the process of organizing organisms into hierarchically inclusive groups based on their phenotypic similarities or evolutionary relationships. A species comprises one or more strains, and closely related species are grouped into genera. Genera are further classified into families, families into orders, orders into classes, and so forth, up to the domain level, which is the broadest taxonomic rank derived from a combination of phenotypic and genotypic data.The nomenclature of...
280
Diversity of Protists III01:27

Diversity of Protists III

230
Rhizaria are a diverse group of unicellular protists characterized by their threadlike cytoplasmic extensions known as pseudopodia. These structures aid in both locomotion and feeding, giving Rhizaria an amoeboid appearance. Their amoeboid morphology once led to taxonomic confusion, but molecular phylogenetics has clarified their evolutionary placement and emphasized their shared use of pseudopodia despite divergent lineages.This clade comprises diverse lineages such as Chlorarachniophyta,...
230
The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes02:40

The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes

35.5K
The “tree of life” describes the evolution of life and the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The root of the tree is the common ancestor to all life on Earth. All other species radiate from this point, much like the branches of a tree. The numerous tips of these branches on the tree of life represent every living, or extant, species. Extinct species, which are species that no longer exist, can be found towards the center of the tree. Currently, these organisms, both...
35.5K
Diversity of Protists IV01:27

Diversity of Protists IV

270
Amoebozoa represent a diverse group of terrestrial and aquatic protists that utilize lobe-shaped pseudopodia for locomotion and feeding. This characteristic differentiates them from the Rhizaria, which possess threadlike pseudopodia. The primary classifications within Amoebozoa include gymnamoebas, entamoebas, and the plasmodial and cellular slime molds. Phylogenetic evidence indicates that Amoebozoa diverged from a lineage that ultimately gave rise to fungi and animals.Gymnamoebas and...
270

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CHARACTERS, OBSERVATIONS AND STEPS: COMMENT ON LIPSCOMB'S "PARSIMONY, HOMOLOGY AND THE ANALYSIS OF MULTISTATE CHARACTERS" VÉRONIQUE BARRIEL.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

Rooting with Multiple Outgroups: Consensus Versus Parsimony.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

A proboscidean from the late Oligocene of Eritrea, a "missing link" between early Elephantiformes and Elephantimorpha, and biogeographic implications.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2006
Same author

Status of the so-called African pygmy elephant (Loxodonta pumilio (NOACK 1906)): phylogeny of cytochrome b and mitochondrial control region sequences.

Comptes rendus biologies·2003
Same author

Mitochondrial cytochrome b of the Lyakhov mammoth (Proboscidea, Mammalia): new data and phylogenetic analyses of Elephantidae.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2003
Same author

A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa.

Nature·2002

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

288

THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROBOSCIDEA: HOW MANY CLADISTIC CLASSIFICATIONS?

Pascal Tassy1

  • 1Laboratoire de paléontologie des vertébrés et de paléontalogie humaine (UA 720, CNRS). Université Pierre & Marie Curie (Pans VI), 4, place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France.

Cladistics : the International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society
|December 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

A phylogenetic system, proposed by Hennig, could serve as biology's reference system. However, multiple classification systems can derive from a single cladogram, making a universal system elusive.

More Related Videos

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

7.2K
Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps
05:28

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Published on: January 19, 2020

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

288
Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

7.2K
Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps
05:28

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Published on: January 19, 2020

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Systematic biology
  • Phylogenetic classification
  • Taxonomy

Background:

  • Willi Hennig proposed a phylogenetic system intended as a universal reference for biology.
  • This system required phylogenetic trees to be directly translatable into phylogenetic systematics.
  • The classification of Proboscidea was reviewed over twenty years of proposed technical improvements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of a single, universal phylogenetic system for biology.
  • To analyze the relationship between cladograms and formal classification systems.
  • To assess the practical application of phylogenetic systematics in biological classification.

Main Methods:

  • Review of classificatory technical improvements, conventions, and rules over the past twenty years.
  • Application of these rules to the classification of the Proboscidea.
  • Analysis of the relationship between cladograms and formal classification systems.

Main Results:

  • More than one formal classification system can be derived from a single cladogram.
  • The "phylogenetic system" is more synonymous with a cladogram than a written classification.
  • A universal "general reference system of biology" remains theoretical due to communication preferences.

Conclusions:

  • A single, universally accepted "phylogenetic system" for biology is not practically achievable.
  • Written classifications are preferred for communication over diagrams, hindering a unified system.
  • Cladograms represent phylogenetic relationships, but multiple classifications can stem from them.