Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Bifurcation functional significance score as predictor of mortality: a validating study
Dobrin Vassilev1, Niya Mileva2,3, Carlos Collet4
1Cardiology Department, Medical University Sofia, "Alexandrovska" University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria. dobrinv@gmail.com.
Insights
A new Bifurcation Functional Significance Score (BFSS) helps assess coronary stenosis. A BFSS of 6.0 or higher predicts increased mortality risk in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary bifurcation stenosis treatment has advanced, but anatomical assessment alone doesn't predict functional significance.
- Existing methods lack systematic evaluation of baseline functional significance and its impact on outcomes.
- Functional assessment is crucial for managing complex coronary artery disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an angiographic score to determine the functional significance of coronary bifurcation stenosis.
- To assess the correlation between the developed score and procedural/clinical outcomes, including mortality.
- To investigate the impact of side branch territory size on mortality risk.
Main Methods:
- Patients with significant angiographic bifurcation lesions were included (diameter stenosis >50%).
- Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) was measured in the main vessel (MV) and side branch (SB) before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- A Bifurcation Functional Significance Score (BFSS) was developed using parameters like SYNTAX score, BARI score, and degree of stenosis in MV and SB, and lesion length. The score was validated in derivation and clinical effect cohorts.
Main Results:
- A BFSS was developed with a maximum value of 11. A cut-off value of 6.0 demonstrated high discriminatory ability (87% accuracy, 77% sensitivity, 96% specificity).
- Patients with BFSS ≥ 6.0 showed significantly higher all-cause mortality (25.5% vs. 18.4%, p=0.001) and cardiac mortality (17.7% vs. 14.5%, p=0.016) compared to those with BFSS < 6.0.
- Smaller absolute side branch territory was associated with significantly lower cardiac mortality (p=0.023).
Conclusions:
- An angiographic score (BFSS) effectively determines the functional significance of coronary bifurcation stenosis.
- A BFSS ≥ 6.0 identifies patients at higher risk of all-cause and cardiac mortality.
- Smaller side branches represent a greater mortality risk in coronary bifurcation lesions.
Abstract:
Considerable progress has been made in the treatment of coronary bifurcation stenosis. Anatomical characteristics of the vessel and lesion, however, fail to give information about the functional significance of the bifurcation stenosis. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study that systematically establishes the baseline functional significance of coronary stenosis and its effect on procedural and clinical outcomes. Patients with significant angiographic bifurcation lesions defined as diameter stenosis > 50% in main vessel and/or side branch were included. FFR was performed in main vessel (MV) and side branch (SB) before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 169 patients from Fiesta study (derivation cohort) and 555 patients from prospective bifurcation registry (clinical effect cohort) were analyzed to validate angiographic prediction score (BFSS) used to determine the potentially functional significance of coronary bifurcation stenosis. Bifurcation functional significance score (including the following parameters-SYNTAX ≥ 11, SB/MB BARI score, MV %DS ≥ 55%, main branch (MB) %DS ≥ 65%, lesion length ≥ 25 mm) with a maximum value of 11 was developed. A cut-off value of 6.0 was shown to give the best discriminatory ability-with accuracy 87% (sensitivity 77%, specificity 96%, p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in all-cause mortality between patients with BFSS ≥ 6.0 vs. BFSS < 6.0-25.5% vs. 18.4%, log-rank p = 0.001 as well as cardiac mortality: BFSS ≥ 6.0 vs. BFSS < 6.0-17.7% vs. 14.5%, log-rank (p = 0.016). The cardiac mortality was significantly lower in patients with smaller absolute SB territory, p = 0.023. An angiographic score (BFSS) with good discriminatory ability to determine the functional significance of coronary bifurcation stenosis was developed. The value for BFSS ≥ 6.0 can be used as a discriminator to define groups with higher risk for all-cause and cardiac mortality. Also, we found that the smaller side branches pose greater mortality risk.
Related Concept Videos
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Cancer Survival Analysis
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...

