Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

12:19
Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
Published on: July 1, 2013
11.0K
Keratinized mucosa changes around one-stage implants: A prospective case series
Giuseppe Mainas1, Vanessa Ruiz Magaz1, Cristina Valles1
1Department of Periodontology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
|December 23, 2021
Summary
Keratinized mucosa (KM) width significantly decreased around implants after 3 months, while buccal soft tissue volume increased. This study highlights dynamic soft tissue changes post-implant placement.
Area of Science:
- Periodontology
- Dental Implantology
- Oral Surgery
Background:
- The necessity of adequate keratinized tissue (KT) for periodontal health around teeth and implants remains a long-standing debate with no definitive conclusions.
- Maintaining sufficient keratinized mucosa (KM) is crucial for the long-term success and health of dental implants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate changes in keratinized mucosa (KM) width and soft tissue volume around non-submerged implants.
- To assess these soft tissue alterations prior to prosthetic rehabilitation in a series of patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective case series involving 40 patients undergoing dental implant procedures.
- Measurement of KM width at buccal and lingual aspects, comparing pre-existing KT with measurements at baseline (T0) and 3 months post-surgery (T1) using intra-oral scanning.
- Assessment of buccal soft tissue volume at 1, 3, and 5 mm apical to the healing abutment, comparing T0 and T1 using statistical analysis (Student t-test, Shapiro-Wilk).
Main Results:
- Baseline mean KT width was 4.54 mm (buccal) and 5.04 mm (lingual).
- After 3 months, mean KM width decreased significantly to 3.15 mm (buccal, 30.6% reduction) and 3.72 mm (lingual, 26.1% reduction).
- Buccal soft tissue volume demonstrated a statistically significant increase between baseline and the 3-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Significant dimensional changes in KM width were observed at both buccal and lingual aspects within 3 months post-implant surgery.
- The study indicates a reduction in KM width but an increase in buccal soft tissue volume around implants during the observed period.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the implications of these dynamic soft tissue changes for long-term implant outcomes.

