Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.6K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.6K
General Transcription Factors01:30

General Transcription Factors

5.8K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
5.8K
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

10.8K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
10.8K
Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

6.6K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
6.6K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

6.7K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
6.7K
Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

79.0K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
79.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissecting the enhancer gene regulatory network in early Drosophila spermatogenesis.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Autonomous function of Antennapedia in adult muscle precursors directly connects Hox genes to adult muscle development.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2025
Same author

Comprehensive Predictions of Mef2-Mediated Chromatin Loops, Which May Inhibit Ubx Binding by Blocking Low-Affinity Binding Sites.

Journal of developmental biology·2024
Same author

Canalizing cell fate by transcriptional repression.

Molecular systems biology·2024
Same author

Specificity of the Hox member Deformed is determined by transcription factor levels and binding site affinities.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Single-cell RNA sequencing of motoneurons identifies regulators of synaptic wiring in Drosophila embryos.

Molecular systems biology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries
10:10

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries

Published on: March 31, 2019

8.5K

An Evolutionary Perspective on Hox Binding Site Preferences in Two Different Tissues.

Laura Folkendt1, Ingrid Lohmann2, Katrin Domsch1,2

  • 1Developmental Biology, Erlangen-Nürnberg University, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.

Journal of Developmental Biology
|December 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Broadly expressed transcription factors like Ultrabithorax (Ubx) exhibit distinct DNA binding patterns in different tissues. This study reveals tissue-specific chromatin interactions and DNA motifs for Ubx, suggesting relaxed binding specificity in the mesoderm.

Keywords:
Hox genesUltrabithorax (Ubx)binding specificityevolutionmesoderm

More Related Videos

A Rapid In Vivo Bioassay for Developmentally Active Enhancers
00:08

A Rapid In Vivo Bioassay for Developmentally Active Enhancers

1.3K
An Optimized Protocol for Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Using Infrared Fluorescent Dye-labeled Oligonucleotides
09:58

An Optimized Protocol for Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Using Infrared Fluorescent Dye-labeled Oligonucleotides

Published on: November 29, 2016

16.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries
10:10

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries

Published on: March 31, 2019

8.5K
A Rapid In Vivo Bioassay for Developmentally Active Enhancers
00:08

A Rapid In Vivo Bioassay for Developmentally Active Enhancers

1.3K
An Optimized Protocol for Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Using Infrared Fluorescent Dye-labeled Oligonucleotides
09:58

An Optimized Protocol for Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Using Infrared Fluorescent Dye-labeled Oligonucleotides

Published on: November 29, 2016

16.1K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Transcription factors (TFs) orchestrate multicellular organism development.
  • Understanding how broadly expressed TFs function across diverse cellular contexts remains a challenge.
  • Hox TFs, like Ultrabithorax (Ubx), are crucial for development but their tissue-specific roles are not fully elucidated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the tissue-specific chromatin interactions of the broadly expressed Hox TF Ubx.
  • To uncover differences in Ubx binding behavior between mesodermal and neuronal tissues.
  • To explore the molecular basis for context-dependent TF function.

Main Methods:

  • Bioinformatic analysis of genomic chromatin interactions.
  • Analysis of Ultrabithorax (Ubx) binding sites in *Drosophila* mesodermal and neuronal tissues.
  • Motif discovery and analysis of histone mark distribution.

Main Results:

  • Ubx interacts with tissue-specific chromatin sites in both mesodermal and neuronal tissues.
  • The canonical Hox/Ubx DNA binding motif is enriched in neuronal interactions, while a novel, low-affinity motif is found in mesodermal interactions.
  • Distinct distributions of active and repressive histone marks are observed at tissue-specific Ubx binding sites.

Conclusions:

  • Broadly expressed Hox TFs like Ubx display context-dependent DNA binding and regulatory roles.
  • Tissue-specific binding differences may arise from evolutionary adaptations, such as the emergence of new germ layers.
  • Relaxed binding specificity in the mesoderm could facilitate novel regulatory functions of Hox TFs.