Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

07:32
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
1.4K
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites
Alessandro Ugolini1, Paola Agostino1, Armando Silvestrini-Biavati1
1Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|December 24, 2021
Summary
Orthodontic treatments like quad-helix and expansion plates effectively correct posterior crossbites in children. Quad-helix offers a shorter treatment duration and superior results compared to expansion plates for children aged 7-11.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Craniofacial Development
Background:
- Posterior crossbite, where upper back teeth occlude inside lower back teeth, affects 4-17% of children and adolescents.
- This condition is linked to jaw development issues, joint problems, and facial asymmetry.
- Orthodontic appliances like quad-helix and expansion plates are used to expand the upper jaw and correct posterior crossbite.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of various orthodontic treatments for correcting posterior crossbites.
- To compare the outcomes of different appliances and interventions against observation and each other.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted.
- Thirty-one RCTs involving approximately 1410 participants were included.
- Data on posterior crossbite correction, inter-molar and inter-canine distances, and treatment duration were analyzed using fixed-effect models.
Main Results:
- For children (7-11 years), quad-helix and expansion plates significantly corrected posterior crossbites compared to observation, with high-certainty evidence.
- Quad-helix was more effective than expansion plates in correcting posterior crossbite and increasing inter-molar distance, with a shorter treatment duration.
- For adolescents (12-16 years), Hyrax and Haas appliances showed similar efficacy in correcting posterior crossbite and increasing inter-molar distance.
Conclusions:
- Quad-helix and expansion plates are beneficial for correcting posterior crossbites in children (7-11 years).
- Quad-helix demonstrates superior efficacy and shorter treatment duration compared to expansion plates in this age group.
- Evidence for adolescent treatment efficacy is less robust, with Hyrax and Haas showing comparable results.

