Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Functional Assessment of the Donor Heart During Ex Situ Perfusion: Insights from Pressure-Volume Loops and Surface Echocardiography
Published on: October 11, 2022
Do septic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction require a low-volume resuscitative strategy?
Robert R Ehrman1, Jakob D Ottenhoff1, Mark J Favot1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine; Detroit Medical Center/Sinai-Grace Hospital, 4201 St. Antoine, Suite 6G, Detroit, MI 48201, United States of America.
Clinicians can safely administer intravenous fluids (IVF) to septic patients with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (rLVEF). Septic patients with rLVEF received similar IVF volumes and experienced no increased adverse outcomes compared to those without rLVEF.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Clinicians hesitate to administer 30 cc/kg of intravenous fluids (IVF) to septic patients with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (rLVEF) due to concerns of volume overload.
- Previous studies relied on heart failure history, not presenting LVEF, potentially confounding the relationship between rLVEF, IVF, and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between IVF volume and clinical outcomes in septic patients with and without rLVEF.
- To determine if rLVEF impacts the safety and efficacy of IVF administration in sepsis.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study in an urban Emergency Department (ED).
- Included adult patients with suspected sepsis (infection + SBP <90 mmHg or lactate >2 mmol/L).
- Left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by ED echocardiogram before >1 L IVF administration.
Main Results:
- 73 patients enrolled; 33 had rLVEF (<40%).
- Patients with rLVEF were older, had higher initial lactate, and more ICU admissions and vasopressor use.
- Similar 3-hour IVF volumes between groups (2.2 L vs 2.0 L); rLVEF patients more likely to reach 30 cc/kg (61% vs 45%).
- Hospital, ICU, and ventilator days were comparable between groups.
Conclusions:
- Septic patients with rLVEF received similar IVF volumes as those without rLVEF.
- No increased adverse outcomes related to volume overload were observed in the rLVEF group.
- Limiting IVF in septic patients with rLVEF may not be necessary, warranting further validation.
More Related Videos
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
10:05Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management