Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
How can ports act to reduce underwater noise from shipping? Identifying effective management frameworks
Laura Recuero Virto1, Hervé Dumez2, Carlos Romero3
1Centre for the Law and Economics of the Sea (UMR M101 AMURE), European Institute for Marine Studies, Rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280 Plouzané, France; Interdisciplinary Institute for Innovation (UMR 9217 i3), École Polytechnique, Bâtiment Ensta, 828, Boulevard des Maréchaux, 91762 Palaiseau Cedex, France.
Abstract:
This paper aims to find mechanisms to align commercial interests with underwater noise reductions from commercial shipping. Through a survey and a series of interviews with representative stakeholders, we find that while acknowledging the wide variations in ports' specificities, port actions could support the reduction in underwater noise emissions from commercial shipping through changes in hull, propeller and engine design, and through operational measures associated with reduced speed, change of route and travel in convoy. Though the impact of underwater noise emissions on marine fauna is increasingly shown to be serious and wide-spread, there is uncertainty in the mechanisms, the contexts, and the levels which should lead to action, requiring precautionary management. Vessels owners are already dealing with significant investment and operating costs to comply with fuel, ballast water, NOx and CO2 requirements. To be successful, underwater noise programs should align with these factors. Based on a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approach, we find a set of compromise solutions for a wide range of stakeholders. Ports could propose actions such as discounted port fees and reduced ship waiting times at ports, both depending on underwater noise performance. Cooperation between ports to scale up actions through environmental indexes and classification societies' notations, and integration with other ports' actions could help support this. However, few vessels know their underwater noise baseline as there are very few hydrophone stations, and measurement methodologies are not standardized. Costs increase and availability decreases dramatically if the vessel buyer wants to improve the noise profile. Local demands regarding airborne noise close to airports boosted global pressure on the aviation industry to adopt existing quieting technology. This experience of the aviation noise control could inform the underwater noise process.
More Related Videos
06:22The Floating Lab: Standard Operational Procedure for Collecting and Filtering Seawater Samples from Operating Ferries for Environmental DNA Analysis
Published on: August 1, 2025
09:01Handling and Tagging Techniques for Implanting Juvenile American Shad with a New Acoustic Microtransmitter
Published on: June 14, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sustainable Development
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Multiple Pipe Systems
Series Configuration
In a series configuration, fluid flows sequentially from one pipe...
Atherosclerosis III: Management