Editor's Choice - Timing of Carotid Intervention in Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and
Andreia Coelho1, João Peixoto2, Armando Mansilha3
1Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal; Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculdade Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Portugal.
Insights
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is safer than carotid artery stenting (CAS) within 7 days of symptom onset. Expedited CEA meets international guidelines, while optimal CAS timing remains undefined.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Neurology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Timely intervention for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis is crucial for stroke prevention.
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are primary revascularization strategies.
- Optimal timing for these procedures relative to symptom onset is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the timing of CEA and CAS after symptom onset.
- To evaluate 30-day outcomes for CEA and CAS at varying time intervals within 14 days.
- To compare the safety and efficacy of CEA versus CAS based on procedural timing.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
- Searched Medline and Cochrane databases for relevant studies.
- Included 71 studies with 232,952 symptomatic patients; assessed study quality.
- Endpoints included procedural stroke and/or death, stratified by delay and technique (CEA/CAS).
Main Results:
- CAS showed higher 30-day stroke and mortality rates compared to CEA when performed within 2 days of symptom onset.
- Expedited CEA (≤2 days) showed no significant difference in 30-day stroke rates versus later intervention (3-14 days).
- Expedited CAS (≤2 days) had similar stroke rates but significantly higher mortality compared to later intervention (3-14 days).
Conclusions:
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is safer than transfemoral CAS within the first 7 days of symptom onset.
- Expedited CEA aligns with international guidelines regarding absolute stroke rates.
- The optimal timing for CAS, when indicated over CEA, requires further definition and standardized reporting.
Objective:
This review aimed to analyse the timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) after the index event as well as 30 day outcomes at varying time periods within 14 days of symptom onset.
Methods:
A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis statement, comprising an online search of the Medline and Cochrane databases. Methodical quality assessment of the included studies was performed. Endpoints included procedural stroke and/or death stratified by delay from the index event and surgical technique (CEA/CAS).
Results:
Seventy-one studies with 232 952 symptomatic patients were included. Overall, 34 retrospective analyses of prospective databases, nine prospective, three RCT, three case control, and 22 retrospective studies were included. Compared with CEA, CAS was associated with higher 30 day stroke (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58 - 0.85) and mortality rates (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.31 - 0.53) when performed ≤ 2 days of symptom onset. Patients undergoing CEA/CAS were analysed in different time frames (≤ 2 vs. 3 - 14 and ≤ 7 vs. 8 - 14 days). Expedited CEA (vs. 3 - 14 days) presented a sampled 30 day stroke rate of 1.4%; 95% CI 0.9 - 1.8 vs. 1.8%; 95% CI 1.8 - 2.0, with no statistically significant difference. Expedited CAS (vs. 3 - 14 days) was associated with no difference in stroke rate but statistically significantly higher mortality rate (OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.39 - 5.50).
Conclusion:
At present, CEA is safer than transfemoral CAS within 2/7 days of symptom onset. Also, considering absolute rates, expedited CEA complies with the accepted thresholds in international guidelines. The ideal timing for performing CAS (when indicated against CEA) is not yet defined. Additional granular data and standard reporting of timing of intervention will facilitate future monitoring.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care


