Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Two randomized controlled trials for colorectal cancer screening invitations developed using a behavioral science
Jill Tinmouth1, Diego Llovet2, Rinku Sutradhar3
1Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Prevention and Cancer Control, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Targeted invitations significantly increased colorectal cancer screening rates in men and women compared to standard invitations or no invitation. Behaviorally informed, tailored messages enhanced screening participation in organized screening programs.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Behavioral Science
- Cancer Screening
Background:
- Organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs aim to reduce cancer incidence and mortality.
- Mailed invitations are a key component of screening program outreach.
- Optimizing invitation strategies can improve screening uptake.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of behaviorally informed, targeted invitations versus standard invitations and no invitation for colorectal cancer screening.
- To compare male-specific and unisex invitations for men, and unisex invitations for women within a CRC screening program.
Main Methods:
- Two pragmatic randomized controlled trials were conducted in Ontario, Canada, involving individuals aged 50-74 due for CRC screening.
- Participants were randomized to receive male-specific, unisex, standard invitations, or no invitation.
- Primary outcome was completion of the guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT); secondary outcome was uptake of any colorectal test within 5 months.
Main Results:
- Both male-specific and unisex invitations significantly increased gFOBT completion in men compared to controls (ORs ranging from 5.99 to 7.24).
- Unisex and standard invitations significantly increased gFOBT completion in women compared to controls (ORs of 7.07 and 6.76, respectively).
- Findings were consistent for the secondary outcome of any colorectal test uptake.
Conclusions:
- Mailed invitations are effective in promoting colorectal cancer screening for both men and women.
- Behaviorally informed, targeted invitations demonstrate increased benefit compared to no invitation, enhancing screening program effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Group Design
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...

