Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Epigenetic Regulation01:46

Epigenetic Regulation

31.5K
Epigenetic mechanisms play an essential role in healthy development. Conversely, precisely regulated epigenetic mechanisms are disrupted in diseases like cancer.
31.5K
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance02:30

Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance

35.5K
Diploid organisms inherit genetic material through chromosomes from both parents. Copies of the same gene are known as alleles. In most cases, both alleles are simultaneously expressed and allow various cellular processes to function optimally. If one of the alleles is missing or mutated, the expression of the other allele can compensate; however, this is not true for all genes.
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
35.5K
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression02:35

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

23.9K
Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the nucleus greatly influences  access to genetic information. Generally, the nucleus' periphery is considered transcriptionally repressive, while the cell's interior is considered a transcriptionally active area. 
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
23.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can switching between different types of myopia control spectacles enhance effectiveness? Findings from a real-world study.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Pattern of association between school grades and myopia: longitudinal findings from the SCORM cohort.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of Low-Dose Atropine Combined With Bright Light Therapy for Controlling Myopic Eye Growth in Schoolchildren: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Supplementation with high spatial frequency in visual environments for Chinese children to arrest myopia: A proof-of-concept exploratory study.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same author

Time outdoors prevents myopia in hyperopic children, but protection is weaker in premyopic children: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised trial.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Intergenerational change in China's epidemic of myopia: the impact of the social environment.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Inducement and Evaluation of a Murine Model of Experimental Myopia
07:20

Inducement and Evaluation of a Murine Model of Experimental Myopia

Published on: January 22, 2019

10.1K

Correlation between small-scale methylation changes and gene expression during the development of myopia.

Kate Thomson1, Jeremy Game1, Cindy Karouta1

  • 1Centre for Research in Therapeutic Solutions, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

FASEB Journal : Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
|December 27, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study suggests DNA methylation plays a role in how visual cues influence eye growth and myopia development. Changes in DNA methylation were observed in specific retinal cells in response to visual stimuli.

Keywords:
EGR1FOSNAB2methylationmyopiaocular development

More Related Videos

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

37.4K
Correlating Gene-specific DNA Methylation Changes with Expression and Transcriptional Activity of Astrocytic KCNJ10 Kir4.1
11:19

Correlating Gene-specific DNA Methylation Changes with Expression and Transcriptional Activity of Astrocytic KCNJ10 Kir4.1

Published on: September 26, 2015

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Inducement and Evaluation of a Murine Model of Experimental Myopia
07:20

Inducement and Evaluation of a Murine Model of Experimental Myopia

Published on: January 22, 2019

10.1K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

37.4K
Correlating Gene-specific DNA Methylation Changes with Expression and Transcriptional Activity of Astrocytic KCNJ10 Kir4.1
11:19

Correlating Gene-specific DNA Methylation Changes with Expression and Transcriptional Activity of Astrocytic KCNJ10 Kir4.1

Published on: September 26, 2015

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Epigenetics

Background:

  • Ocular growth regulation and myopia development are influenced by visual cues.
  • Early growth response-1 (EGR1), FOS, and NGFI-A binding protein-2 (NAB2) are key genes in this process.
  • The mechanism translating visual cues into molecular changes, potentially via epigenetic modifications like DNA methylation, remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate DNA methylation changes in EGR1, FOS, and NAB2 regulatory regions during altered ocular growth in chicks.
  • To determine if DNA methylation mediates the impact of visual stimuli on ocular development and myopia.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized bisulfite sequencing to analyze DNA methylation in promoter and regulatory regions of EGR1, FOS, and NAB2.
  • Examined chicks experiencing periods of increased and decreased ocular growth due to visual manipulation.
  • Assessed methylation pattern variability (entropy) to identify cell-specific changes.

Main Results:

  • Visually induced changes in ocular growth rates correlated with single-point, not large-scale, shifts in DNA methylation levels.
  • Analysis of methylation variability indicated that observed changes occur within small retinal cell subpopulations.
  • Findings align with previous studies showing differential regulation of EGR1 and FOS at the peptide level in specific retinal cells.

Conclusions:

  • DNA methylation is a potential mechanism for translating visual cues into molecular changes that regulate ocular growth.
  • Epigenetic modifications, specifically DNA methylation, may be critical in the development of myopia.
  • Further research into cell-specific epigenetic regulation is warranted for understanding myopia.