Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.1K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.1K
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

31
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
31

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An fMRI examination of the role of the Locus Coeruleus in state regulation in ADHD.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Slower transitions between control states lead to reductions in cognitive flexibility over the lifespan.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Control adjustment costs limit goal flexibility: Empirical evidence and a computational account.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

The Cost of Regulating Effort: Reward and Difficulty Cues With Longer Prediction Horizons Have a Stronger Impact on Performance.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same author

Reward and Efficacy Modulate the Rate of Anticipatory Pupil Dilation.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

Major depression symptom severity associations with willingness to exert effort and patch foraging strategy.

Psychological medicine·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.2K

Guiding spatial attention by multimodal reward cues.

Vincent Hoofs1, Ivan Grahek2,3, C Nico Boehler2

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. vincent.hoofs@ugent.be.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|December 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Reward prospect influences attention, but multimodal reward signals are understudied. Visual and audiovisual reward cues enhance attention, with visual cues showing effects at shorter durations and audiovisual cues at longer durations.

Keywords:
Multimodal cuePosner cueing taskRewardVisual attention

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Attention is guided by sensory inputs and reward prospect.
  • Multimodal signal processing and reward effects on attention are well-researched.
  • Research on multimodal reward signals influencing attention is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how multimodal reward cues affect attentional guidance.
  • Examine the time course of reward-modulated attention for different cue modalities.
  • Determine if auditory and visual reward cues combine linearly.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Posner task with peripheral cues (audiovisual, visual, auditory).
  • Manipulated reward prospect (reward/no-reward) and stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs).
  • Conducted follow-up experiments isolating visual and auditory reward cue effects.

Main Results:

  • Audiovisual and visual reward cues enhanced cue-validity effects, unlike auditory cues.
  • Visual reward cues showed effects at short SOAs; audiovisual cues showed effects at longer SOAs.
  • Reward modulated performance only for visual reward cues in isolation.

Conclusions:

  • Visual reward cues have a stronger impact on attentional guidance than auditory ones.
  • Multimodal reward signals do not combine linearly; they create a qualitatively different attentional process.
  • Adding auditory cues to visual ones shifts the timing of attentional effects rather than increasing amplitude.