Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

A Non-invasive Way to Isolate and Phenotype Cells from the Conjunctiva
Published on: July 5, 2017
Optimizing cluster survey designs for estimating trachomatous inflammation-follicular within trachoma control
Julia W Gallini1, Eshetu Sata2, Mulat Zerihun2
1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Optimizing trachoma surveys for mass drug administration (MDA) decisions is key. This study found that fewer clusters with more households offer cost-efficient precision for trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) estimates, depending on district prevalence.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Trachoma elimination relies on mass drug administration (MDA) guided by prevalence data.
- Current MDA decisions use two-stage cluster surveys, necessitating evaluation of their efficiency.
- Mathematical assessment of trachoma survey designs is needed to optimize resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate how varying sample sizes impact the precision and cost of trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) estimates.
- To mathematically characterize the effects of cluster and household numbers on survey design for trachoma elimination programs.
Main Methods:
- Simulated a population of 30 districts in Amhara, Ethiopia, with diverse TF prevalence.
- Evaluated sampling schemes with varying numbers of clusters (14-34) and households (10-60).
- Assessed schemes based on precision, MDA decision accuracy, and estimated costs.
Main Results:
- The number of clusters sampled significantly influenced precision more than household numbers.
- Optimal survey design varied by district TF prevalence.
- For <10% prevalence, 20 clusters of 20-30 households were most cost-efficient; for >10% prevalence, 15-20 clusters of 20-30 households were optimal.
Conclusions:
- Context-specific survey designs can enhance precision and reduce costs for long-term trachoma programs.
- A balanced approach involves sampling 15-20 clusters (20-30 households each) for moderate-to-high prevalence districts.
- Sampling 20 clusters (20-30 households each) is recommended for districts near the 5% TF prevalence threshold.
More Related Videos
12:27Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
Published on: February 15, 2017
07:44In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...