Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

NEW QUESTIONS IN GENETICS AND EVOLUTION.

Stuart A Kauffman1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA 19104.

Cladistics : the International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society
|December 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the Criticality of Adaptive Boolean Network Robots.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

A third transition in science?

Interface focus·2023
Same author

Quantum aspects of the brain-mind relationship: A hypothesis with supporting evidence.

Bio Systems·2022
Same author

The hiatus between organism and machine evolution: Contrasting mixed microbial communities with robots.

Bio Systems·2022
Same author

Quantum Gravity If Non-Locality Is Fundamental.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Attractor-Specific and Common Expression Values in Random Boolean Network Models (with a Preliminary Look at Single-Cell Data).

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same journal

Phylogenomics and the evolutionary history of the Oxyurida (pinworms).

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2026
Same journal

Budding speciation, mitochondrial capture and introgression between surface and cave lineages in the Asellus aquaticus species complex.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2026
Same journal

Some considerations about Cotton and Wilkinson's "majority rule supertrees".

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomics and historical biogeography of the cosmopolitan velvet ant tribe Trogaspidiini (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae).

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2026
Same journal

Monotypic genera: uninformative, but sometimes necessary.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2026
Same journal

Morphology-based phylogeny of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) aligns with phylogenomics and informs higher-level systematics.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2026
See all related articles

This study examines "developmental constraints" in evolutionary biology, finding that while allometry and heterochrony are useful, they don't fully explain constraints. A structuralist approach offers a more comprehensive framework for understanding evolutionary patterns.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • The concept of "developmental constraints" is frequently used in evolutionary analyses.
  • Existing analytical frameworks like allometry, heterochrony, and quantitative genetics have limitations in explaining these constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the application and interpretation of "developmental constraints" in evolutionary biology.
  • To explore alternative theoretical frameworks for understanding constraints on development and evolution.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critique of existing methodologies in allometry, heterochrony, and quantitative genetics.
  • Examination of theoretical underpinnings of developmental constraints.
  • Case study analysis of examples including phyllotaxis, echinoid morphology, and gene regulation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Allometric analysis provides a descriptive framework but not a causal explanation for constraints.
  • Analysis of heterochronies does not inherently demonstrate the presence of developmental constraints.
  • Quantitative genetic threshold models do not adequately explain the non-arbitrary nature of evolutionary alternatives.

Conclusions:

  • A structuralist approach to developmental constraints warrants further attention.
  • This perspective offers a more robust framework for understanding evolutionary patterns and limitations.
  • Examples from diverse biological systems support the utility of a structuralist viewpoint.