Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Comparison of Drainage Methods After Pyeloplasty in Children: A 14-Year Study
Xiangpan Kong1,2, Zhenpeng Li1,2, Mujie Li1,2
1Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Insights
Trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent (TEUS) is not recommended for drainage after laparoscopic pyeloplasty due to higher recurrence rates and complications. Double-J stent and percutaneous trans-anastomotic stent show better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a common cause of hydronephrosis in children.
- Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a standard surgical treatment for UPJO.
- Postoperative drainage methods are crucial for successful outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the efficacy of different postoperative drainage methods after laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
- To identify the optimal drainage strategy to minimize complications and recurrence.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 838 pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJO (2007-2020).
- Analysis of demographics, perioperative data, and long-term follow-up outcomes.
- Comparison of three drainage methods: double-J stent, percutaneous trans-anastomotic (PU) stent, and trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent (TEUS).
Main Results:
- No significant difference in preoperative demographics among the drainage groups.
- TEUS group showed a statistically higher incidence of reoperations and recurrences (3.19%) compared to DJ (0.36%) and PU (0.93%) groups.
- Recurrences in the TEUS group were associated with stenosis and iatrogenic valvular formation.
Conclusions:
- Not all drainage methods are equally suitable for laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
- TEUS is not recommended due to its association with increased complications and recurrence rates.
- DJ and PU stents appear to be safer and more effective drainage options.
Abstract:
Objective: To summarize our experiences with drainage methods after laparoscopic pyeloplasty with a 14-year study. Methods: We reviewed the data of the 838 children operated on for hydronephrosis due to congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) between July 2007 and July 2020. Patients' demographics, perioperative details, postoperative drainage stents [including double-J stent, percutaneous trans-anastomotic (PU) stent, and trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent (TEUS)], complications, hospital stay, and long-term follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Long-term follow-up was performed by outpatient visits and telephone follow-up. Moreover, we reviewed the details of nine cases of recurrence after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Results: Comparison of preoperative general data among the three groups indicated that there was no statistical difference in age, gender, and surgical side of the three groups. Statistical differences were found in the incidence of postoperative complications from the three postoperative drainage method groups, especially the incidence of reoperations (p < 0.01): there were six cases (3.19%) of recurrences in the TEUS group, two cases (0.36%) in the DJ group, and one case (0.93%) in the PU group. In the six recurrent cases from the TEUS group, four cases (44.4%) were found to have stenosis, and two cases (22.2%) have iatrogenic valvular formation. Conclusion: Not all three types of drainage methods are suitable for drainage after pyeloplasty. Based on our findings, TEUS is not recommended.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management

