Disparities in Craniosynostosis Outcomes by Race and Insurance Status

Disparities in access to care for surgical intervention in craniosynostosis have been suggested as a cause in discrepancies between the surgical approach and consequently perioperative outcomes following surgery. This work aimed to investigate the influence of race, insurance status, and the presence of craniosynostosis-related conditions on the short-term outcomes after the surgical management of craniosynostosis. Using the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2010 to 2012, sociodemographic predictors for 30-day postoperative complication rates and requirements for blood transfusion in craniosynostosis surgeries were identified. Medicaid patients were significantly more likely to experience complications (P = 0.013) and higher rates of blood transfusions (P = 0.011). Compared to those without any complications, patients who experienced postoperative complications and blood transfusions were older (191.5 versus 181.7 days old, P < 0.001), had a greater number of chronic diseases (P < 0.001), and had a longer average length of stay (P < 0.001). On multivariable regression, Medicaid patients were 1.7 times more likely to experience any postoperative complication compared to privately insured patients. White patients also experienced a 0.741 times lower likelihood of requiring a blood transfusion. At the hospital level, receiving surgery at government-operated hospitals was found to be a protective factor for postoperative complications compared to for-profit private (P = 0.016) and nonprofit private (P = 0.028). Healthcare providers and policy makers should be cognizant of these sociodemographic disparities and their potential causes to ensure equitable treatment for all patients regardless of insurance status and racial/ethnic background.