Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025
The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
A quantitative gain-independent assessment of the left atrial appendage as a method of thromboembolic risk
Brody Slostad1, Kevin Lee2, Michael Trybula1
1Department of Cardiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background:
Visual assessment of the left atrial appendage (LAA) by echocardiography for the presence of thrombus is inherently qualitative. However, whether quantitative assessments can provide increased value over qualitative assessment has not been thoroughly examined.
Methods:
One hundred and thirty-eight patients (mean age 59 ± 13 years, 70% male) undergoing transesophageal echocardiography prior to pulmonary vein isolation or electrical cardioversion were retrospectively studied. LAA were examined by two expert readers and identified as thrombus, sludge, spontaneous echocardiograph contrast, or normal. LAA were then separately examined to calculate a gain-independent ratio between the average pixel density of the LAA cavity and that of the LAA wall (C/W ratio).
Results:
C/W ratio was significantly related with qualitative LAA analysis (p < 0.0001) and with thromboembolic events (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.095-2.347, p = 0.02). The C/W ratio (AUC 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.86) was a reliable predictor for future thromboembolic events when compared to expert reader LAA assessment (Expert Reader 1 AUC = 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.90; Expert Reader 2 AUC = 0.69).
Conclusions:
The C/W ratio may be a complementary method to adjudicate thromboembolic risk in patients with AF that is readily quantifiable at time of TEE.
